5 riddles of the Iranian War and Israel, which are rarely known to the public

Tehran – A week after the 12 -day conflict, which brought the Middle East and the world to the border of destruction, a fragile ceasefire between the United States, Israel and Iran, which was mediated by the United States, was still valid. This world came true the day after the United States mobilized the bunker destroyer weighing 13,000 kg in three main nuclear places in Iran. Nevertheless, many important questions that have not yet been answered.

5 riddles of the Iranian War and Israel, which are rarely known to the public

1. Iranian nuclear program

Launch Gulf News, The exact damage caused by Iran’s nuclear abilities is still unclear. While President Trump said that the targeted location was “destroyed”, and his defense minister said that the place was “destroyed”, the initial report of the US defense agency indicated significant damage, but was not complete destruction at Fordow, Natanz and ISFAHAN facilities.

Rafael Grossy, the head of the International Agency for Nuclear Energy (IAEA), expressed this opinion, confirming that three Iranian places with the ability to process, the conversion and enrichment of Uranus were “destroyed to a significant level”. Nevertheless, he warned that “some are still standing”, and a full assessment depends on Iran, which gives access to the inspector.

Also read: What is a marriage operation? Investigation for 20 years to find several spies in Mi6

2. The future of American Iranian relations

The early hopes for De Escalacy, which was caused by President Trump’s proposal to reduce sanctions and present Iran as a “large trade country” quickly disappeared.

It is argued that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that Tehran gave a slap on the American face, caused a tough refutation of Trump, which then retreated to relieve immediate sanctions.

Although the White House confirmed that there was an initial discussion to continue negotiations, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Arachchi denied an agreement on the rebooting of negotiations. Trump’s own commitment to negotiations is also inconsistent when he declares the NATO peak meeting: “We could sign an agreement,” but added: “I don’t think it is necessary.”

3. The potential of Iranian cultivation

The Iranian missile attack on the US base in Qatar was mainly rejected by the White House as a symbolic act that was easily parked from previous warnings.