It is often applauded that Laporta Get used to going out and giving explanations at a press conference. Undoubtedly, appearing and exposing oneself has merit and is a sign of transparency, but if the truth is not accompanied in the explanations, the communication exercise is in vain. If one does a minimum of critical exercise, one can find many contradictions or lies in what is said by Laporta.
The most obvious thing is that Laporta could not keep his promise that the Barca return to normal on the market. Laporta He claims it’s because he really didn’t want to force the contracts, but that contradicts the confidence he showed in June. The reality is that it required the departure of Gundogan and the injury of Araujo and Christensen register Íñigo Martínez and Dani Olmo. Of the latter, he said Laporta that it was the absolute priority, while we know very well that his priority was Nicolas Williamsfor which he declared that the Barca I could and wanted to sign him and that everything was in the player’s hands. Today, with the market closed, there is no more talk of Nicholas out of respect for Athletic. Besides, Laporta He was not generous in honoring the gesture of Gundogan: referring to sporting reasons instead of economic reasons does not correspond to the truth.
With Barça Studios Laporta He was unable to provide reasonable explanations. Alluding to a technical error that the League does not calculate the 10 million that are actually intended for a former partner who invested this money is nonsense. Incidentally, this confirms again that the initial sale of Barça Studios It wasn’t real. The original buyers had no intention of paying the 100 million that corresponded to them. Nor could he offer any certainty about the return to Camp Noueven if it seems reasonable to me given the unpredictability of the work.
Asked about Black, Laporta He said that “things always come out when we do well.” Besides being false, just look at the news released last season, Laporta sets the bar too low to do well over a period of time Barcelona. Finally, put the emphasis back on the real Madrid inside case Black This is simply a crude attempt to blame one of the possible victims. What would Laporta do if it was Real Madrid who had paid the vice-president of referees? What would your partners have demanded? Laporta talks a lot and has charisma, but he only convinces the devotees who do not need to be convinced.
