Experts warned this Thursday about new “Topics Control “ In the judicial system in Mexico after the recent elections obtained as a result of the reform Judicial branch, June 1, where 881 federal charges and more than 1800 local posts in the country were resumed.
During the presentation of the analysis “Ten lessons of judicial reform”headed by the observatory in the justice system Ibero -American University (Iberian) From Mexico, experts reflected on how they “rethink the control mechanisms”, the centers of power and “possibly” the method of operating justice in the country, based on electoral experience on June 1.
Read also: “Flossus” decomposes to a post -otropic cyclone after passing through the Pacific Ocean
Ana Laura Magaloni, The coordinator of the observatory emphasized that the threads of control over justice in Mexico are reconfigured “cruelly”, as evidenced in the recently created Court of judicial discipline -The evidence of all judges in the country whose members coincide with conflicting lists or “accordions” are distributed a few days before the elections in order to influence the vote.
Journalist Daniel Moreno, Editorial Director of Medium Political animal, repeated that the existence of the official website of the official party was documented (Brunette), With these guidelines or “accordions” to influence the vote, which had an efficiency of 90% of federal election charges
“90% of the candidates promoted on this page were winners (…), they won 28 out of 31, which they promoted (and) only in the disciplinary court were nine winners,” he said.
At the local level, said Moreno, “This unevenness was reproduced in each state”, With governors and parties that develop their “accordions” and use “their mobilization capabilities in order to be able to impose their winners.”
“And we see, for example, the fact that the Supreme Courts of Justice (TSJ) in the States and disciplinary courts (TD) were almost completely won by the candidates proposed by the governors,” he said.
Moreno emphasized that when considering the curriculum of the elected presidents of these courts, “there is a suspiciously very important number of legal advisers to the governors themselves”, as in a state of state TamaulipasWhere are the next presidents TSJ And TD They were legal consultants.
So, Magaloni He warned of the appearance of another control group consisting of governors and client structures in the States, which will now have great power over the mechanism of justice. “
“We do not forget that the judges and magistrates who want to stay in their post must compete again every nine years,” he warned.
Except, Magaloni He indicated that the “opposition played the identical” to the ruling party, ”but played where he could play”, as in the States KoahulaIN DurangoIN Aguascalientes and ChihuahuaWhere now the governors “own local judicial powers (…), which will last nine years.”
“The one who comes after the governor does not own this court structure, and this guarantees these governors a dose of impunity even in the face of the next elections,” the expert said.
With information EFE.
