Home Latest News Labor Government in the UK: Keir Stranders dilemma

Labor Government in the UK: Keir Stranders dilemma

11
0

A M 12, ten days after the right populist “British Reform” from Nigel Farazh won the local and regional elections in England, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said goodbye to the previous migration policy. The British “experiment with open borders” failed, he said in his official residence for 10 downing stroke. If everything goes so, “we become a country of strangers.” The British were shocked on the left. The choice of words made directly during racist agitation since the 1960s and the 1970s.

In less than two months, Keir Standmer is horrified. The choice of words on May 12 “was wrong,” he said last weekend to his biogratus to that Balduin in a conversation for Sunday newspaper ObserverField “I honestly tell you: I am deeply regretted that I used them.” He probably did not read the speech properly.

Really now? Former General Prosecutor of Great Britain, a champion of thoroughly studying files, such as no other politician in the country, suddenly accidentally spoke how Nigel Farah?

A year ago, on July 4, 2024, the Labor have won a grand victory after 14 years of opposition. Today, in fact, the young Labor Government is a change in a bunch of fragments. The anti -migration speech, which was regretted today, is only one example. The symbolic measures of strict savings in the social sector, which he takes today, taking into account the resistance of the internal party of swelling, are different.

Dear costumes, concert cards Taylor Swift for children: nothing was too worn for great work

This is a sample: the first Strait Strait, Starmer scares his own base in order to restore the lost voters who migrated to the right. Then he will fire them again, reorganizing his own supporter. In the end, all parties are unhappy and no longer have confidence. This largely explains why there are so many Nigel Farash voters turn – “British Reform” is the only opposition party acting as a folk party.

In the summer of 2024, immediately after the change of power, the course that forced Strandmer’s train to break. On the one hand, Great Britain experienced massive, mass violence against refugees and migrants, which is not corrected from nowhere after the brutal murder of three girls through 17-year-old Rudin origin in the attack of a knife; The judiciary was extremely stable against white violent offenders.

Almost at the same time, the government stopped equally stable painful social abbreviations, justified by the disputed statement that the home hole left by the conservative is much more than expected. However, a few weeks after something still dominated in the headings: an almost endless sequence of revelations about the advantage of the advantages from all leading labor politicians, accepting generous private gifts from the party donors at a time when the Laborists were still in the opposition, but were in place and, therefore, attractive for lobbyists. Dear costumes and luxurious accessories for Taylor Swift concert cards for children: nothing was too worn for great people.

Everyone got together, it was a disaster. When working with proper violence, the state showed that it may take a difficult time if it wants. If he does not do this against illegal migration, the Labor Government will be interpreted as two levels. And then the new government also justifies the assumption of private luxurious gifts in the morning and the need for social abbreviations for the poor in the afternoon.

Since this is the fatal summer of 2024, Straiter tried in vain to straighten all this. Immigration remains high, but the older is not like that. Social expenses remain high, but Starmer is not one of them. It is assumed that military expenses are increasing, but Stander does not have funds. He publicly defends a policy that he cannot implement. The problem is not whether the policy is right or to the left. This is that the government does not do what he says.

Foreign policy is not used at home

In the first half of 2025, Strasser was mainly on the road in terms of foreign policy. He found good relations with Donald Trump, he called the European “coalition of those who wish” for Ukraine, he concluded a partnership agreement with the EU and trade agreements with India and the USA. He has growth in the world. But this is little used at home.

All this is not a personal problem of Keir Standmer, as many commentators offer in their anniversary changes. This is the problem of European Social Democracy of the 21st century. Already the victory in the election of the Laborists in 2024 remained significantly for all the research and expectations with 34 percent of the vote, and only the separation of the correct opposition between the conservatives, Tori and the reform of the UK allowed the Labor Party to win in two parts in the lower house, in which there were only direct mandates. Meanwhile, the Laborists fell to 20-25 percent in the examinations, still behind the reform of the UK.

The decision of the dilemma does not return to the alleged remaining certainty – if it were so, the predecessor of Jeremy Korbin would become the prime minister. Nevertheless, he cannot consist of a run in his right confidence – if it were so, the Laborists could call to choose a Nigel Farah. The Stantmer solution is currently in order to continue. This really cannot be an alternative. But this does not mean that it is good. It is strange against the will – the correct prime minister for the confusing and cynical country.

An honest person who constantly fights and still never finds happiness – the British can recognize themselves in this.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here