The victory of Mamdani shakes the democrats … and Trump is angry
The confrontation between US President Donald Trump and a candidate from the Democratic Party for the post of mayor of the Norco Zahran Mamdani intensifies when the White House strengthens his attack on a young politician who describes him as a “crazy communist” and waving him with arrest and deportation from the country.
While the Democratic leaders defended Mamdani in the face of Trump’s attacks, I reserved his support for the fear of the growth of the socialist part to which he belongs and his promotion of conflicting ideas in this context. Many say that the victory of Mamdani indicates something, so voters seek to reconsider the identity of the Democratic Party, whose rules are still destroyed after defeat in the elections. Some believe that the party has lost its communication with the street, while others read on the stage, an indication of a reduction in the affordable space for the “moderate” on both sides, especially with the announcement of the Republican Senator Tom Telez about his resignation after the confrontation with Trump to join the long list of “intermediaries”, which left or lost its places.
The Washington reporting program, which is the fruit of cooperation between the Al -Shark Al -Ausat newspaper and the al -Shark channel, examines the signs of the victory of Mamdani and how it will affect the future of the Democratic Party and America.
“Crazy Communist” or “Bright Model”?
Theen Bond, a former director of democratic election campaigns and a former activist in a progressive voting turnout, criticized Trump for his attack on Mamdani and called him a communist and accuses him of “dictatorship” from some of his presidential decisions. Bond defended Mamdani, saying: “When we look at Mamdani, we see the idea of the groups that saw such a presence. This is an example of Muslim leadership. An example of young leadership. An example of fat and progressive ideas. And when we are talking about progress in this country and about the restraint of everyone, it is not like everything that is not like everything that is, not like everything that is not like everything that is, like everything that is not like everything that is, not like everything that is not the same as everything that is. This, although what does not satisfy, it may be the best for the population of New York. ”
For his part, the democratic strategic expert Ari Arash believes that the reason for the victory of Mamdani is the existence of a “very strong mood” for institutions not only in the Democratic Party, but throughout the country. He described what is happening as a “political farce to the right with Donald Trump, and another farce on the left of the mamdani and his approach,” he said.
“This is Pernie Sanders and Ilhan Omar from the first side, as well as Margory Taylor Green and Tikkar Carlson on the other side,” says Aramash.
“My problem is not in the personality of Mamdani, but with what he represents; She introduces unrealistic ideas and slogans. On the other hand, Trump did the same; He promised and lied repeatedly until he was elected. “
As for Sandy Adams, the former director of the Chancellery of the Republican representative of Bob Good, he agreed to the description of Trump Mamdani to the Communists, noting that he accepted “communist ideas, regardless of whether he had approved or denied it.” His ideas related to the government administration are criticized, warning that “the acquisition of government stores and the production of goods leads to catastrophic consequences.” She adds: “Mamdani contributes to communist principles that harm our country. We are the Constitutional Republic, which we judge the Constitution, and he spent twenty years since his arrival in seventh place. This is America, a free market community, and what is called government financing is actually taxpayers’ money. Ideas for New York are community, so I don’t talk about him, but also about that, but this is personally, but it wears, but, but, it wears, but, but, but also, but also about that, but also about that, but also about what he, wears, nuumies.
A crack in a democratic party
In the face of criticism of Trump and Republicans, the victory of Mamdani showed a gap in the ranks of the Democratic Party, especially with outstanding faces in the party, like the democrats of the Senate and representatives of Chuck Schumer and Khakim Jeffers, both of New York, for his support.
Aramish considers ideas as the ideas of mammals that harm the Democratic Party, which hesitates in politics, which led to its loss in the elections, such as immigration policy and calls to stop the financing of the police. “This is losing issues of the Democratic Party,” he says. Let’s go to the center and talk about the failures of Trump, lies, catastrophic economic plans and an outrageous decrease in taxes on rich, manipulating and drying it in their resources, but not to mention reducing the financing of the police and opening the border. ”
But Bond contradicts and remembers that the center was those who led the Democrats loss in the elections. “While Trump and supporters (MAG) went to the extreme right, the democrats did not turn on the left. Regardless of whether we agree with the extreme right or not, they led themselves through a lie, novels and strong slogans that they adhere to the harsh. This extremism proved that they believe that the Democrats “were stuck in the middle and trying that they were still not there, and they were not yet, and they were not yet, and they were not yet, and they were not yet, and they were still in the long -standing, and they were not yet that they could still represent the Americans, in fact, adding:” they are not adding: They rose to show a real confrontation in the face of the Republicans. ”
From the far right left
While expectations are growing during the election scene from the extreme right right in the extreme Leu in some political circles, Adams rejects this approach, emphasizing that Trump won because the Americans “raised their kilogram because the government did not serve the people, but steal them,” she said. Adams said that Trump solved these waste and the problem of illegal immigration in the United States and added: “I am with immigration, but with legal immigration. I never think we will return to the left; We were satisfied with this. Education is also another problem. I am a six children and twenty -twenty -twenty victories of Trump and education – just another reason.
Aramash is followed by Adams’s comments, and he admits that the Democratic Party “has lost the essence of the questions that people mean” and ignore the economic sufferings of many Americans. This gives an example in California and criticized the open border policy adopted by the Biden administration. He adds: “Partly the cause of the Republicans, and Trump is not because he is a wonderful person, but because people were afraid of the Democrats. The democratic party should return to the center. We hid from the public the fact that Biden, a former US president, was not in good condition for several months. This is a crime. Thus, this is not due not to the fact that the Republicans are great, smart or quarrels, that they can defeat, but rather that the agenda of the Democrat and candidates from the Democrats are also bad.
Detention and deportation
Perhaps the most controversial problem in the United States is to hint Trump with the possibility of deporting mamdani. Adams agreed with this approach, noting that Mamdani threatened to challenge the decisions of the immigration and customs department that deport illegal immigrants. “According to the Constitution, the president’s mission and the government should maintain the country’s security,” she says. And if he feels the threat of our national security, he has the right to arrest him.
On the other hand, Bond categorically rejected this approach and said that “the president has no right to deport some kind of American citizen or someone else just because he does not like what he says. That is why we have a constitution. If President Trump was really committed to him, and Congress held him to adhere to this, we would not be in this discussion. Find out the origin of your ancestors? To what extent can this absurd be achieved? If we find that the ancestors arrived on the ship in front of generations, do we have the right to expel their grandchildren? The correct answer was to be gone. We have a constitution, and even when it does not serve our interests, it remains a constitution that must be observed. “
