Home Latest News “To complete the PAC as a specific policy will be the greatest...

“To complete the PAC as a specific policy will be the greatest betrayal of the European rural area”

14
0

The Agrarian Association of Young Farmers (Assaja) is intently followed by the first steps of negotiations on European accounts that are afraid that they reduce funds for agricultural policy and terminate their current configuration as an autonomous policy. This is explained by his president, Pedro Dehero, when inferior in Electionomista.es.

The European Union began to prepare the following budgets with an emphasis on defense, are you afraid that they will reduce agricultural policy?

We have two fears, and I hope you are not fulfilled. The budget for defense is necessary and important for the European Union, but cannot be made by dismantling the general agricultural policy (PAC), which was the basis for the construction of the former European economic community. We are afraid that they take money from agricultural policy to pay for the next generation, which some countries have already said that you should start paying. We believe, and that is why we are going to demonstrate the 16th in Brussels that the best missiles, tanks, drones and ammunition are that there are not enough diets.

Which budget requires PAC until 2034?

The European commission must understand that the PAC must have at least the same budget as in the current inflation that we suffered during this period.

In recent months, it has been commented that the commission wanted to unite PAC with other community means, what will be the consequences of this change?

The combination of community means means the disappearance of PAC as a specific and autonomous policy. If the budget is also circumcised, what implies is a direct drop in the output of farmers and agricultural assets. If this is confirmed, this will be the greatest betrayal that they are going to do in the European rural area.

It was also said about the possibility of connecting these tools with the performance of a milestone at the country’s level.

It seems that this is losing power, because most of the member states showed the rejection of this unique fund, which grouped the cohesion policy and the PAC, through the Council of Ministers of those who are responsible for agriculture 27. There is currently a non -lawsuit, the European People’s Party heads the commission and is presented as a guarantor of the rural world, but allows the PAC to lose weight and financing. And there is a discrepancy with the European parliament, so that each organ goes on the one hand.

In what sense?

The European parliament goes more for the positions that we protect, and not the unique budget and restrictions that the commission protects. Instead, the parliament protects two pillars, direct PAC tools and the development of rural areas, which is very important for Spain.

How do you appreciate the positions that implement PP and PSOE?

We were with the Spanish members of the directors, and the truth is that there is a small difference between PSOE, PP and even VOX as a whole. They do not share what the commission is now protecting, the problem is that this has just begun, what is being done this month is important, but there are many negotiations until it is approved by the heads of state.

Some voices claim that this policy will be decentralized, what is your position in this?

We can criticize PAC, but it is true that it has reached each corner of the peoples of Spain when European politics was pursued. And we have an example of a certain help that autonomous communities or the government require a lot of time to pay them. All that needs to be removed by the European obligation is to go against farmers and, in particular, the Spaniards. Pac Renction is barbarism, although we must wait for the meeting of the Committee on Agriculture and the Development of Rural Regions to see if it will be provided on the table.

In recent years, they have been marked by conflict in Ukraine and are currently discussing what role the EU should accept, how should the Ukrainian cereals currently relate?

It is simple, you should help Ukraine, but it cannot be done by destroying Spanish farmers. There should be time periods in imports, because we need more than we produce here, but we must also do contingents so as not to jeopardize Spanish grain. With the production costs and prices that we have, right now the grain sector. Tons below 200 euros and minimum production of 4000 kg of cereals, which require most farms. We have prices 32 years ago, and yet, in the products that we need to produce, prices are located at the level of 2026.

WhatsAppFacebookTwitterLinkedinBeloudBluesky

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here