The special representative of Margaret Sudkhof (SPD) testified on Tuesday in the Budget Committee for masking. After almost two hours of the confidential session, green and left continue to see the need for information. “We have not finished today – there are more open questions,” said the home politician Paul Pechotta. The Joof Survey “was not enough,” said Left Boss Ines Schverdnner. The Sudhof budget committee wants to ask again at the end of July.
The green and left invited the courtshof to ask them about their report on the investigation. In it, she accused the leader of the trade union faction Jens Span. Being the Minister of Health, he promised to accept masks at excessive prices during Apandemia in the crown, caused an excess of the process and ensured the abolition of certain companies. He later refused compensation. This led to damage, sometimes the federal government approves today with mask dealers.
Colleague of the Span, Minister of Health Nina Warken, gave a report to the committee with blackening. At the end of last week, the whole report became known: the ministry was also censored in the footnote, which showed that Span personally participated in procurement decisions at high price.
This says a lot about how openly and transparently the trade union wants to communicate with the public on this topic
Paul Pechotta, Greens
The court himself said on Tuesday before the meeting that the Ministry of Health gave her “there is no full permission to a statement” that she should not speak in the public. Your statement in the budget committee was also confidential. “This says a lot about how openly and transparently, the trade union wants to communicate with the public on this topic,” Pihotta commented. The statement of the courthof is opposed to the statement of Span and Warken – “and one lies.”
SPD can move soon
Span, Warken and other trade union politicians have repeatedly attacked Sudhof and claimed that their report was “motivated for party policy”. On Tuesday, the Ministry of Health was also appointed for public contradiction by the Sudkhof. Her statement that she “does not have an unlimited statement” is wrong, the representative of the ministry said. The Sudkhof in the non -public committee would be completely asked “on the topics of her report” and could give information.
However, since the report is continued to be classified by the ministry as the question of closing, the courtshof is not actually allowed to publicly comment on the charges of the Ministry of Health.
The left and green continue to request the Investigative Committee, which will promote witnesses and take their oath, including individuals such as masks traders. Nevertheless, two democratic opposition parties lack nine votes, because they do not want to work with AFD. Nevertheless, the Investigative Committee will become “more likely from the daytime,” Pihotta said. SPD also sees this in this way.
However, until now, not a single member of SPD has declared more detailed information. Apparently, you do not want to endanger the government. Instead, Schwartz-PRO plans to use the individual commission on the Corona subject, and Bundestag must decide on Thursday. Such a commission has less rights than the Investigative Committee. Nevertheless, green and left, probably, will also be right, not least because it should be mainly about the pandemic.
