The President of the Independent Department of Financial Liability (Airef) Christina Herrero announced that they had raised consultation with state protection from the presidential institution Before the additional pension report, which will be requested from Airef before June 1, 2026. To observe Brussels. The official state newspaper (BOE) published last week a modification of the royal resolution of February 18, in which he established how Airef should evaluate the pension system in case of additional income measures, reports Europa Press.
In the introduced changes in Airef, it will be necessary to prepare an additional report for issuing March 31 on the execution of the rules of expenditure for a pension before a petition in Brussels, so that when evaluating pensions, transfers of the state are not taken into account, compared with what was collected in the previous royal decree of the government.
When he was asked about the problem at the press conference in this environment, Errero indicated that from Airef does not understand the reason for the additional pension report That the government commanded Airef and assured that the diagnosis of the stability of the pension system “would be the same in 2026 as this year and 2023.
Little has changed
“In terms of sustainability, we continue to say the same thing that the reform of the pension system increased the imbalance in social security accounts for more than one GDP point,” Errero said.
“What is the problem? We have a rule of pension expenses that measures something. This does not measure the stability of the pension system. And then, it’s true that from here to a month, one year, maybe something can change. He changed it from 2023 to 2025, but not to diagnose the pension system, but for economic growth, ”he added.
Ask to stop this “drift”
For Herrero, the exercises are “performed”, so he criticized that what is not included in the organic law that regulates these procedures is not respected without forcing the institution that presides with the conduct of a new exam. “I don’t know what new data we will have. I do not understand this, ”he said, asking,“ to stop this drift. ”
During the transfer, Airef President assured that if she had to speak out next year “next year”, the same transfers held last March will be adopted. “We have an organic law that very clearly tells us what we should do. Some reports that are those that are, and not yet.He put up.
Given this situation, they raised a consultation with state protection from Airef, so they are configured if “opinions are voluntary and, therefore, they cannot be imposed by law” and pronounce whether the reports that are included in the organic law, and not those that are collected in the last real decisions.
“We mainly ask is that the terminology will be clarifiedThe field of what we asked, I already asked about it in the congress is that it is very restrictive, very punctual, that the law establishes that Airef should evaluate something, in -secondly, that the terminology is applied well, and that they call it, it remembers what our law says. And this is that reports are what is, and that opinions are voluntary, and therefore the only possible way is the evaluation order, ”he said.
“This implies that Airef, in the implementation of its independence and autonomy, determines that he will evaluate what the scope is, what is the methodology that he will use, and what is the calendar, which allows him to use his resources correctly,” he added.
