Korunya was the first city of Galicia to receive a declaration of a tense market for residential premises from Xunta. The Galician government reluctantly lost after all possible obstacles to the fact that it was a legal imperative, and even its final decision on adoption seemed to be criticized by the measurement and the law of housing, which covers it. If anyone thought that Milestone was going to alleviate things for those who remained, he was wrong. Santiago de Compostela, the second on the list, just got an amendment to return to the box. The consistory does not hide his surprise before a resolution loaded with “value judgments and opinions that are not typical of an administrative document.”
In a letter with ten pages sent on Tuesday by Galego da Vivenda E Solo (IGVS), Geriberto Garcia, approves the correction of “shortcomings” to the documentation sent at the end of May, because it believes that “does not fit” to the state of the state of housing. Such a reformulation of the petition leaves in the suspension a period of six months, available for XUNTA to approve the application.
The first thing that diagnosed Santiago is that it uses the “mainly” data of the “famous real estate portal” that “cannot be justified” with the argument that “they are used in academic studies of obvious severity and scale,” since “in no case can equate” academic work to the application of the stress zone, ”which leads to the fact that it includes.”
Only for this, the Vivenda Department already claims to be a new diagnosis, which “begins only exclusively from the data that appears in official statistics or in the hands of state bodies.” He believes that this change will include a “significant” change in documents that were subjected to the public, which will force both the document and the memory of the excuse, “obey the new process of public information”. Thus, Xunta suspenses the maximum period of six months to resolve the application, while this requirement is accepted.
“Little attentive reading” Xunta
The City Council of Santiago did not hide his “surprise” from the reaction of Xunta and his “numerous valuables and opinions” along with statements, which “offer a little attentive reading of well -tired documentation”.
In its statement, the local government regretted that Xunta “questioned” the study conducted by the team of “experts from the public university of the University of Galego”, in particular, the University of Korunya and reminds him that some of the data used belong to the IGV itself and “enough for himself.
The consistory is also the Mint, which the “Galician government” has obstacles to an action that could do directly if it had a will, and not accusations of municipalities with an obligation to submit research and other documentation. ”In their response, IGVS denied that the authority belonged to the autonomous administration, referring to the Law on the Housing of Galicia 2012.
“The city council understands that a new diagnosis is not needed, and, in any case, it will answer, after a more delayed analysis, to all the appearance of problems.” The compostel’s answer ends, stating that from his point of view “data, diagnostic and corrective measures, firmly and strictly confirm the proposal for the announcement of the market zone of housing”.
Measures “without incidence” and assessment, for which “lack of roundness”
Although for the Xunta, the data source is enough to paralyte the entire process, IGVS does not leave the diagnosis section and justifies the memory without criticism. It says, for example, to miss the analysis of the state of preservation of the existing housing park in the Galician capital, as part of the plan to establish corrective measures.
He also asks that the document “With references to the antiquity of the real estate park will be completed, to the built area of houses or the evolution of the number of real estate transactions”, some data “available in official sources”.
Vivenda is focused on the concept of the “Great fork”. For Santiago, this is the one that is the owner of five or more real estate for use in residential premises as part of the municipal term, which is justified because, according to IBI, there are more than a hundred those houses in the compotel that are “exceptional owners” of this type of owners.
The document recalls that, according to the National Institute of Statistics, recognized in the application itself – in Santiago there are 56,746 Viveas, so it does not seem “in proportion to the fact that the number 100 properties is very significant.” The IGVS director concludes that the consequences that an application for the market zone of the residential market zone are growing will imply for large holders, recommend “great power” when evaluating how they influence the reduction of stress and a “greater excuse” of their potential influence on the lease market.
As for a specific plan with corrective indicators of the tension market, the institute gives Vivenda and only believes that measures are “absent” to turn this situation and can develop directly without the need to “have a declaration. The argument that I already used in the case of Korunyu.
In addition, he believes that “most detailed measures in the document are implemented or constantly performed,” although others “do not have certain content.” Finally, IGVS, the director of the autonomous organization, warns that this plan “should include the calendar of the implementation of the most specific proposed measures, since it now establishes that“ since 2025 and with the temporary horizon of 2028 ”.
