Silvia Bronchalo is sure that “Rodolfo Sancho told me that I should not go to Thailand to see Daniel because the whole family would be threatened with death by Colombians linked to the late Edwin Arrieta.” Also, he insists, Rodolfo Sancho She told her son she “was crazy” and insisted that Daniel did not want Silvia to call his son while he was awaiting trial in prison for Edwin’s murder. Rodolfo, according to the caller, tried to isolate him from his son Daniel and insulted and harassed her during telephone conversations in the months leading up to the trial.
All these statements are included in the appeal that Silvia Bronchalo has filed against the order that filed her complaint against Rodolfo Sancho before the summer. In this new appeal, Silvia Bronchalo insists that Rodolfo Sancho be tried for the alleged crimes of habitual psychological violence, humiliation, insults and coercion. Crimes that he would have committed during the conversations between the two before her son’s trial.
Daniel Sancho’s mother appealed the order that filed the complaint due to the lack of evidence and contradictions between witnesses. Silvia Bronchalo appealed because she believes that the order is based on irrational arguments and accuses the judge of ignoring the witnesses, exceeding his duties and “insist on exonerating Rodolfo Sancho”.
Daniel Sancho’s mother presented her appeal at the end of July, a document of more than thirty pages in which she once again refers to the alleged humiliating expressions that Rodolfo Sancho would have devoted to his ex-partner during the conversations they had during the judicial process. her son. These messages, according to Bronchalo’s defense, constitute a minor offense of humiliation but as she did in her complaint rejected by the judge, Silvia Bronchalo insists that this was the usual treatment that Rodolfo Sancho inflicted on her and also accuses him, now without messages by media. , of the crimes of habitual mental violence and coercion.
According to Silvia Bronchalo’s appeal, since Daniel Sancho entered prison, Rodolfo Sancho tried to isolate her from her mother by preventing her from communicating openly with Daniel and from participating in Daniel’s defense strategy with which she openly disagreed.
“Daniel says don’t call him”
Silvia Bronchalo’s appeal explains that Rodolfo Sancho isolated her from Daniel by telling his son that “she is crazy” or that his presence in Thailand did not suit him. According to Bronchalo, Rodolfo Sancho told him that he should not go to Thailand because the whole family would be threatened with death by Colombians linked to the deceased Edwin Arrieta, or telling him that Daniel “said not to call him”contrary to what the son told his mother during his video calls with Daniel and his prison visits.
The initial complaint included the accusation against Rodolfo Sancho for habitual psychological abuse for allegedly insulting Silvia Bronchalo with the expressions: “pirate”“you are incapable”, “city center” either “Our son has trauma because of you”.
“Either he would retract it or he would destroy it.”
In addition, Silvia Bronchalo provides unknown information. She claims that shortly before the trial, Daniel called her to tell her that her father Rodolfo had told him that she had reported him in Spain for abuse. In the same call, Daniel told her to publicly retract her statement, otherwise “he was going to destroy her.” According to Bronchalo, Daniel was behind everything and allegedly “manipulated his son” to destroy his mental integrity.
Silvia Bronchalo did not withdraw the complaint, she continued to expand it with this new data, but finally the judge closed it. Now, the new appeal aims to relaunch the accusation to put Rodolfo Sancho on the bench. Silvia Bronchalo’s defense goes so far as to say that “she feels that the decision to dismiss the complaint against Rodolfo Sancho was made in advance” since the order was issued a day after the last witness testified, and includes this reasoning in the causes for reopening the hearing. case against Rodolfo Sancho.
For its part, Rodolfo’s defense, in the hands of Marcos García Montes’ office, will soon oppose Silvia Bronchalo’s appeal. An appeal that does not provide new evidence, but insists on everything that was provided in the previous and rejected complaint. In this sense, it is very likely that Rodolfo’s defense will insist once again on the same arguments that led the investigating judge to file a complaint against Rodolfo.
