Fernando Pees, a tax consultant, sentenced to 80 years in prison in the Nummaria case, will remain released until his sentence is firm and should be fulfilled. The National Court rejected the prosecutor’s request and the state propaganda of introducing his admission to the execution of his sentence, realizing that he had never escaped, and that he also has a responsible relative, which he minimizes the risk of escape. The stump was convicted, among other things, for the assembly of corporate structures used by third parties to evade taxes. Ana Duato was justified, and Imanol Arias sentenced to two years and two months prison in the same case.
The National Court made a total of 80 years in prison as the head of the Nummaria office and mass tax fraud of both him and his clients thanks to the “framework of societies” abroad, which were provided for tax evasion. Together with him, eight people were convicted with the prosecutor’s office and recognized their crimes against the state treasury, including actor Imanol Arias. Ana Duato, who decided to deal with her innocence in court, was justified, for example, producer Miguel Angel Bernardo and several workers of the company.
The condemnation of the stump, which still appealed, led to the fact that both the prosecutor and the state lawyer asked the court, the prosecutor had already entered the prison in order to begin to fulfill his sentence. He condemned, among other things, because he did not pay 10 million IRPF and six more VAT from 2010 to 2015, although their illegal practice occurred from a lot of years ago, at least from 2000, according to the national decision of the court.
The criminal camera explains that the prison does not need to introduce precautions, such as the obligation to go to court twice a month, withdrawing his passport and prohibit him to leave Spain. The judges explain that he never needed to impose any precautions to avoid a run and “has always been in the dy position of the court.” The 80 -year sentence may be more than enough to send him to prison, even if it is not firm, but the judges add that their family circumstances are “in particular, care for the wife” do not allow him to be sent to prison in this discomplement.
