Scruplaity in politics: moral conclusions are allowed

V. In many arguments, why, probably, there is no God, I find this especially good in the apple box. The philosopher Bertrand Russell formed it, and it works: the idea of a god who creates the balancing of justice, approximately as agreed as and when I see when I opened apple boxing, that the upper position is rotten and still suggests that the lower places are probably in order.

In this parable, I like a friendly invitation to flee in the face of mold and ineffectiveness in the desire to run in a desire (a wise, higher plan, a friendly hand), but please, albeit logic or at least the experience of life. Retreat behind Putrefit is the most beautiful, best order. But probably also decay. There is also encouragement: moral conclusions are acceptable, they trust you.

What I would have with the Jens Spahn masking offers. There will probably be a little rain in the Union, when Painting-Seitung enters, but it will not do this, because it (still) is one of his friends. So far, the opposition and authoritative media, all the signs of abuse of the office are evaluated as evidence of abuse of the office, this is more used by CDU and CSU: we are so strong that we are even sitting in this scandal – and sovereignty in which we do this even consolidate our power. This is dishonesty as a form of government.

Some are now enough adults to remember Franz Joseph Ostrus, and they know that the old federal republic was no better when it comes to leadership. In the end, today women are also preferred, provided that they are a daughter from: Andrea Tandler, the daughter of the former Minister of Finance of Bavarian Finance Gerold Tandler (CSU), made a good reduction from 50 million euros in masks.

weekly

This text comes from weeklyThe field is our weekly newspaper on the left! Every week weekly daily daily as a world, and how it can be. Left weekly newspaper with voice, attitude and special view of the world. Every Saturday a newcomer in a kiosk and, of course, in a subscription.

For observers, given the progress of the mask case, a familiar question arises: how much morality should I use to assess the situation? The left learned that morality often stands on the way of describing unfair conditions, and does not help. If you want to describe capitalism, it is better for you not to resist behavioral issues, but to practice a cool analysis. These are more conservatives, which, for example, like to prevent the redistribution of requirements from calling moral values.

Corruption stinks. Morality belongs to politics.

Nevertheless, it is in the struggle for their own self -esteem that opponents of Trump in the United States: “Trump: how could this happen?” -Moral returns as a category. How can such half of America Trump be No Find morally repulsive? I asked recently Atlantic, And he answered with a moral philosopher who explains: if individualism is the goal and purpose of society, no one should be surprised that the naked “I want” becomes the predominant norm – and Donald Trump as a model.

Accordingly, cultural fighters on the right side are mocking the old history of the common world with consideration and reciprocity and everything that is as “moralism”. Smart political scientist described the stitch in Frankfurter Randshau Recently, as a “club of moralism”: the accusation of moralism is intended to demonstrate some kind of demand for climate protection, equality, assumption about responsibility, etc., this calls it hysterical and, possibly, even malicious.

The Apple box is open, and it is not very good in it. Corruption stinks. Morality belongs to politics, and the time can come to develop moral judgments and take a little more seriously.

Leave a Comment