Advertising
The Supreme Court of Brazil issued a home order on Monday for former President Zair Bolsonaro, who was tried for an alleged conspiracy with a coup after his defeat by the current President Luis Inasio Lula da Silva.
Judge Alexander de Moraes, who is investigating the alleged insulting behavior of Zaira Bolsonaro in front of the Supreme Court, said that the 70 -year -old former president violated precautions on him, spreading the content through his three.
The legal team Zaira Bolsonaro stated in her statement that this would appeal the decision. His lawyers emphasized that the words “Good evening, capacabana, my good evening, Brazil, hugs for everyone, are for our freedom”, which were broadcast by the mobile phone of one of his children during the protest in Rio -de -Zhanero, “they cannot“ be considered like ”, because”, as ”, how”, how ”, how”, how ”, as”, as ”, since”.
“A clear contempt for precautions was so obvious that the son of the defendant, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, decided to remove his post from his Instagram profile in order to hide a legal violation,” said de Moes.
De Moraes also said that Bolsonar “turned to the protesters who gathered in Kopakaban, Rio” on Sunday, so his supporters are “trying to force the Supreme Court”.
Flavio Bolsonaro in X claimed that Brazil is “officially in the dictatorship” after restricting his father’s house. “The accusation of de Morais against Bolsonaro has no restrictions!” The senator wrote.
The Bolsonaro court was at the center of interest after the re -choice of US President Donald Trump, who was a convinced supporter of Bolsonaro during his trial. Trump often came across President Lula da Silva from the process of the process, describing him illegal and often demanding his excuses.
The 47th President of the United States even tied the recent 50% of the obligations of Brazilian exports to the United States directly with the judicial provision of his ally. He called the case against Bolsonaro “witch hunting”, which provoked the nationalist reactions of Brazilian lawmakers from all over the political spectrum.
In his statement, a few hours after the announcement of this decision, the US Ministry of Foreign Affairs Bureau condemned the order of Judge de Morais to X and promised “to put everyone who helps and subordinates ratified behavior.”
“The imposition of even greater restrictions on the ability of Zaire Bolsonaro to protect himself is not a public service. Let the Bolsoner speak! ” The body of the US Department of Foreign Affairs is said.
The post occurs a few days after the State Department announced the sanctions against de Morais for the “serious violation of human rights”, the abuse of power and the unfair and politically motivated Bolsonar.
The Brazil government has not yet commented on the matter.
What is Bolsonaro accused of?
Brazilian prosecutors are accused of Zaira Bolsonaro of the leader of a criminal organization planning to overthrow the elections, including plans for the murder of Lula and de Morais, after the populist leader lost his nomination for 2022.
The mandate on Monday came a month after Bolsonero was ordered to wear an ankle transmitter to control his movements and impose his operations, while the legal process continues. Only family members and lawyers allow Bolsonaro to visit after this decision, and all cell phones were removed from his house.
The last decision of the Brazilian justice came the day after tens of thousands of supporters of Bolsonuru went along the streets in the cities of San Paulo and Rio -de -Zanero, begging the Brazilian congress to be awarded himself or one of them or one of them or hundreds. January 2023.
It is expected that Bolsonaro will remain in Brazil to restrict his home, as he is not allowed to travel. He also has a house in Rio -de -Zhanero, where he had an electoral base as a member for three decades.
The former army captain is the fourth former president of Brazil, arrested after the end of the country’s military government from 1964 to 1985, supported by Bolsonaro. Lula was imprisoned for almost 600 days from 2018 to 2019 as a result of a sentence to corruption, which was later canceled by the Supreme Court, referring to the judge’s prejudice in the case.