Rubén Manso wrote the other dayone of the heads in Spain that best provide the liberal discourse of Milei and at that time the creator of the first economic program with which Vox was presented to societythat political axes have long since surpassed the traditional left-right dichotomy. Everything is now reduced to the dialectical field in which those who want more State in their lives (but especially in the lives of others) and those of us who advocate the execution of the strict role that its meaning gives it, that is to say the safeguarding of equality of all citizens before law, ensure your safety And defense And protect individuals -not collective- weaker And disadvantaged that, for geographical circumstances, physical either psychicthey don’t have the same opportunities as others.
In this ongoing discussionon one side of the Leviathan Spectre Where the Left Socialists Stand that from the State they intervene through the party in power, an instrument interposed in the idea of perpetuating itself in power. Its mission is to replace the autonomy of the person to decide on the life project they want, according to their legitimate interests, with the paternalism of a superior entity that tells these same individuals that there are other individuals more capable of choosing what they want. suits them. And on the other hand, the right-wing socialists, who, under a veneer of misunderstood and explained conservatism, wish to intervene in the morality of others under the argument of the triumph of superior values. In both cases it is a liberticidal paternalism that leads us without reference to autocracy.
THE different economic crises that we have experienced with the new century have given many citizens the desire to be supported by the State, at the very cost of abandoning spaces of freedom and personal autonomy. A security better protected than free uncertainty is the propaganda that is consumed daily in the supposedly free and developed West, a euphemism for “obey, shut up and you will be happy”. This has been understood by fundamentally left-wing governments, who have taken advantage of the situation to expand the deterministic role of the State to the detriment of private spaces of personal decision. As man has always preferred security to freedom, convincing him would not be a major problem, with the use of fear as the perfect state of mind to achieve the goal of social control and dependency: from the pandemic to immigration to the increase in civil servants and the plundering of the middle class, everything obeys a plan so that the dominant element of our lives is submission and servitude to the State and government, now converted into a functional autocracy.
But the idolatry of the State is the prelude to illiterate despotism. I reaffirm myself in this maxim while Spain which consumed it is consumed by its own apathy, trapped in subsidised conformism and half-hour rebellion. The data could not be more telling: at the time of writing, there are half a million more people in Spain living off the state than there are private sector contributors, who are the ones funding the party. In other words, the pyramid has been inverted and there are fewer and fewer taxpayers supporting more dependents, a model that will lead to economic failure and misery for future generations. But socialism is, in itself, a failed model that has generated only poverty, resentment, hatred and envy wherever its moral and governmental agenda has been implemented and executed, an idea that is only supported, as Thatcher rightly said, with other people’s money. Until it’s over.
The current paradigm of paternalistic and middle-class progressivism is part of this Richelieuian idea adopted by lovers of the total State for which one can never go to jail. Let us spend without stopping, place as many friends as possible, increase public and private debt and distribute subsidies and taxes everywhere, that someone will pay. This someone is you, a former poor middle-class worker and you, a long-suffering businessman and independent, plundered by the idolaters of power. The fight must now focus on the fight against this State that acts like a drug injected into a part of the population that does not know how to live without the contribution of Big Brother. Putting a brake on the State is the only way to guarantee the permanence of liberal democracy, future progress and the resulting creation of wealth, that is to say the development and growth of the middle class.
THE Kirchner’s Argentina was the model in which Sánchez’s PSOE It was intended to create an eternal network of needs and interests. half of SpainToday, It depends on a man who presses the grant button, the grantIto help either the rise of public marketsthe contributory pension or the youth bonus. And this leads to the formation of a totalitarian democracy, eliminating private property, economic freedom and freedom of expression. With a law that favors squatters, another that persecutes the businessman and a last one that seeks to silence the free press that investigates the corruption of the government, the president and his ilk, we are heading towards a raging Leviathan in which the individual and his unlimited right to choose the life they want will henceforth be nothing more than a mere Orwellian number in this socialist newspeak in which lies are truth, hoaxes are information and corruption is cleanliness. Because let us not forget that every dictator presents his antidemocratic measures in the name of democracy, announces his revolution in the name of freedom and speaks of the people and progress to eliminate the progress of the people.
