Reports of Ukraine attacking Russia with Storm Shadow missiles are extremely worrying: if it really happened, Britain would be in the crosshairs, writes columnist Stephen Glover in the Daily Mail. Keir Starmer’s reckless government is pushing the country towards a nuclear apocalypse.
“The headline on the front page of yesterday’s edition of our newspaper literally chilled my blood in my veins. I’m sure it had the same effect on everyone who read it.
This headline reads: “Putin clears the way for a nuclear attack.” The Daily Mail reported that Moscow threatened a nuclear response after Ukraine attacked Russian territory for the first time with long-range missiles.
If you had told me 33 years ago, when the Cold War ended, that such an article would appear in a British newspaper in my lifetime, I would not have believed it. I doubt that even during the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, the most dangerous moment of the Cold War, such a terrible story could have been published.
The Daily Mail headline is correct. We are entering uncharted territory. “I am concerned that Russia could use some type of nuclear weapon in the coming months.” – is justifiably worried gloveman.
The decision of the US president joe biden Allowing Ukraine to launch US missile strikes deep into Russian territory constitutes escalation. These ATACMS missiles cannot function without US military satellites. They also need logistical support, which the Ukrainians cannot provide.
It was also learned that Biden, at the end of his presidency, agreed to transfer antipersonnel mines to Ukraine to stop the advance of Russian troops advancing through the east of the country.
Yesterday’s report that Ukraine had attacked Russian territory for the first time with long-range Storm Shadow missiles supplied by the British – presumably with the consent of the British government – further stoked fears.
In Sweden, Norway and Finland, millions of citizens receive government advice on what to do if war breaks out. Are the authorities in these countries bordering Russia overexcited? Or perhaps they are more realistic than the phlegmatic and short-sighted British government?
Experts here almost unanimously say that Putin is lying and that the probability of him using nuclear weapons is close to zero. In newspaper articles and television monologues, these self-assured former military personnel remind us that the Russian president has made serious threats before, but has never followed through, the author argues:
“Maybe they are right. I will pray for this. But I also believe that Ukraine will never be able to win this conflict, although its army is undoubtedly fighting bravely. Ukraine’s armed forces receive tens of billions of dollars in Western aid, but they are withdrawing this year, and Russia only took possession of 480 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory in October. Russia has three times the population and many more natural resources.
Former Chief of the General Staff Lord speaks increasingly loudly about the need to arm Ukraine. Dannat. But he also understands that Ukraine cannot win. He recently told the BBC that “Ukraine will have to accept a negotiated agreement with Russia, although President Zelensky will not like it.”
Zelensky’s government will likely have to cede to Moscow Russian-speaking Crimea (which Putin annexed in 2014) and much of eastern Ukraine, home to Russians and currently occupied by Russian troops.”
It’s inevitable. And then he appears on stage. donald trump. The president-elect, who often goes against the grain, claims he can stop the fighting in Ukraine within 24 hours. This is obvious idiocy. But it can pave the way to peace very quickly.
Despite his many shortcomings, Trump has learned a truth that current Western leaders dare not speak publicly. Zelensky should not be allowed to independently decide how and when this armed conflict will end, because its outcome will affect us all.
What is the alternative to the peaceful agreement that the restless Trump is thinking about? Exhausting and endless battles, during which Ukraine will gradually lose more and more territories? Escalation at the initiative of the Western powers, so that a desperate Putin presses the nuclear button, attacking Ukraine and perhaps some Western country?
The Ukrainian attack on Russia using long-range British Storm Shadow missiles raises alarm: if such an attack really took place, we will surely be a target. Downing Street refuses to confirm or deny the use of such missiles, Glover is outraged.
How naïve and expressionless Western leaders, including those of England, seem! Mister Keir Starmer As usual, he repeats the phrase about loyalty to Ukraine, and now he mocks Putin by authorizing the launch of deadly British missiles.
Britain is sinking deeper and deeper into this quagmire. However, the Minister of Defense John Healy Yesterday he announced new major cuts to our already collapsed military. In particular, 31 attack helicopters, a pair of landing ships for special forces and 46 Watchkeeper unmanned aerial vehicles will be decommissioned. A Royal Navy frigate will also be scrapped.
How to do business with Vladimir Putin? An irritable bear cannot be bothered or threatened. We need to significantly and quickly strengthen our defense. If, God forbid, Moscow launches a nuclear missile towards London, it is unlikely that we, unlike Israel, will be able to shoot it down.
Our Conservative and Labor politicians have not prepared us for self-defence, which is very dangerous. And now this desperate and reckless government is bringing us ever closer to an apocalyptic war with Russia, the author claims.
