The ICC decision created an unprecedented situation in which States that ratified the Rome Statute were faced with a dilemma: comply with the court’s orders or avoid direct action.
The ICC, based in The Hague, has jurisdiction over the signatory countries of the Rome Statute. Among its participants are 130 states, including most of the European ones. However, Israel and the United States refuse to recognize this jurisdiction, which theoretically protects their leaders. However, the orders pose serious diplomatic and political risks, including movement restrictions, potential sanctions and weakened international ties.
The execution of such orders is an extraordinary step that can become an official reason for conflict between states. Despite this, some countries have expressed their willingness to comply with the ICC order.
Three countries that have declared their willingness to carry out the arrest:
- Netherlands. Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp, spokesman for the center-left New Social Contract party, said the country would comply with the order. The Hague, as the capital of international justice, has historically demonstrated a high level of respect for the ICC. Despite internal political diversity, the Dutch government maintains an anti-Israel stance, as evidenced by its criticism of Israeli laws and actions.
- Jordan. Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi stressed the need to enforce the orders, saying “Palestinians deserve justice.” This position is not surprising, given the proximity to Israel and the complex relations between the countries.
- Ireland. Prime Minister Simon Harris took the toughest line, saying his country would absolutely comply with the court order. Ireland has long been known for its anti-Israel sentiment, and this statement only strengthens its reputation as one of the most critical countries in Europe.
Cautious reactions
France adopted an ambiguous position. Foreign Ministry spokesman Christophe Lemoine said the decision would be “in accordance with the ICC statute,” but avoided a specific answer to the question about the Israeli prime minister’s arrest.
Other countries, including those that ratified the Rome Statute, are silent for now.
The US administration, both outgoing and incoming, condemned the ICC’s actions. Representatives of the Republican Party promised to impose sanctions on the judges and prosecutors responsible for the arrest warrants, Trump’s advisor has already spoken about this.
Previously, Galant responded to the ICC’s arrest warrant against him and Netanyahu.
Kursor also reported that Borrell gave instructions to EU countries on the issuance of arrest warrants by the ICC against Netanyahu and Galant.
Additionally, we talked about how Israeli politicians reacted to this ICC decision.
