What are the safer countries of the world in case a world war? Joe Biden authorized Ukraine to use ATACMS long-range missilesmarking a turning point in the conflict with Russia. This move aims to strengthen Ukraine’s position in anticipation of a possible change in US policy, especially if Donald Trumpwho advocated for more diplomatic approaches, returns to power. These missiles offer Kyiv an unprecedented offensive capability, allowing it attack strategic objectives on Russian territory, which could weaken the Kremlin’s logistical and military capabilities, particularly in eastern Ukraine.
Although ATACMS missiles promise to give Ukraine an advantage, this measure is not without risks. Moscow has warned that such actions could escalate the conflict and trigger a “World War III”. The Kremlin, however, assures that it continues to take measures to avoid a nuclear confrontation, emphasizing its commitment to containment, despite the escalation of tensions. In this conflict, the United States is leading support for Ukraine, alongside NATO and European countries. On the other hand, Russia enjoys the support of allies such as Belarus, China, North Korea and Iran. In the event of a world war, countries like Switzerland, New Zealand and Bhutan present themselves as safe options, thanks to their neutrality, geographic isolation or political stability.
World War: the safest countries to take refuge in
In an increasingly tense global context, marked by conflicts such as the war in Ukraine and the crisis in Gaza, the possibility of a large-scale conflict causes global concern. Especially after the update of Russia’s nuclear doctrine, international security analysts warn of the need to prepare for unpredictable situations that could escalate into major conflicts.
In this panorama, certain countries stand out for their ability to remain outside international tensions, whether thanks to their historical neutrality, their strategic geography or solid internal systems, and therefore being the safest in the event of war. These nations represent true refuges from global uncertainty, distinguishing themselves by factors such as self-sufficient economies, political stability and low level of militarization.
He Global Peace Index (GPI)an annual report from the Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP), ranks 163 countries and territories based on their level of peace and security. Based on 23 indicators, such as social protection and the degree of militarization, the GPI provides a global view of the safest countries. In 2024, Iceland, Ireland and Austria will top this ranking.
Icelandundisputed leader since 2008, is considered the safest country in the world. Its low crime rate, its geographic isolation in the Atlantic and its social cohesion are key factors. Additionally, its ability to be self-sufficient in energy and natural resources makes it an ideal location in times of conflict.
Irelandwhich comes in second, is another Atlantic island nation that combines political stability, low crime and military neutrality. Its food self-sufficiency and diplomatic engagement reinforce its appeal as a refuge.
Austriain the heart of Europe, rose to third place in the GPI, overtaking New Zealand. Its orientation towards international diplomacy and its participation in peace missions, without being part of NATO, allows it to stay away from war conflicts, while contributing to global stability.
In a context of growing international tensionthese countries stand out for being the safest in the face of a possible war.
What role would Spain have in the conflict?
Valery Zaluzhny, former commander of the Ukrainian army, stressed that the world is already experiencing the first moments of a possible “Third World War”, a scenario that does not seem so distant if we observe recent events in Europe. In countries like Poland, Finland and in the Baltics, borders are reinforced with anti-tank defenses, ditches and fortifications. Poland, for example, is spending 2.5 billion euros on its defense system, including an air shield inspired by the Israeli “Iron Dome”.
Recently, military expert Michael Clarke analyzed a map showing that Russian nuclear weapons They have an impressive range. With more than 5,500 nuclear warheads, Russia has the capacity to launch attacks from land bases or submarines anywhere in the world. Likewise, he has intensified his rhetoric by showing simulations of nuclear attacks, such as a controversial video in which a 750-kiloton explosion devastates the city of London, costing the lives of more than a million people.
On the other hand, experts like Annie Jacobsen warn that a global nuclear conflict This would have catastrophic consequences. In the first 72 hours, the death toll could exceed five billion people, and survivors would face shortages and extreme radiation conditions. Faced with these gloomy prospects, the risk of escalation remains a constant concern on the international scene.
