The Attorney General’s case is not the Attorney General’s case, it is the Moncloa case. The truth is indisputable: the intervention of Óscar López’s chief of staff in the case investigated by Álvaro García Ortiz is a qualitative leap. Faced with the government’s request to the general secretary of the Socialist Party of Madrid, Juan Lobato, to use the information to attack Isabel Díaz Ayuso, Lobato recovered and made two decisions: attack her, but citing the press and non-confidential information. and, months later, as the investigation progressed, going to the notary out of caution. The notarial deed is dated weeks before the leak of the investigation according to which López could present himself as a candidate for the head of the PSOE in Madrid was disclosed last Sunday, so it should not be interpreted in a political sense, but rather in a legal sense. The facts are clear, but there is no doubt that it harms the one who made the right choice, because it is predictable that Moncloa will accuse him of a traitor to attract militancy. This information invalidates Óscar López as a minister, and by extension, as a candidate for everything, and forces Pedro Sánchez to give explanations, because could Sánchez’s chief of staff have done this without the knowledge of the president of the government? The collateral damage is for Lobato, a few weeks before his regional congress. Will Sánchez dare to accuse him of something that the facts deny? He is capable. Or present another alternative candidate.
