Lobato, who is not Machiavelli, revealed the dirty war of Moncloa against Ayuso

Furthermore, this information could only come from two sources. The Department of Finance or the State Attorney General.

That’s to say, Maria Jesus Montero either Álvaro Garcia Ortiz.

And this, after the commission of one of the worst crimes that a civil servant or a senior political leader can commit. The one about leaking secrets.

Only one of the crimes described in the preceding paragraphs would immediately bring down any Western democratic government.

The sum of all these elements places us in a nightmare scenario. That of a government prey to scandals of both economic and political corruption and which has decided to take refuge in Moncloa not only out of a desire to stay in power, but as a criminal survival strategy.

Because as a qualified person, one can delay the inevitable and hope that a stroke of luck in the political council will save him from the Supreme Court.

And this is why it is so important that the PP does not grant the PSOE what it wants most now: to impose a judge of strict socialist obedience to replace the Marchena at the head of the criminal chamber of the Supreme Court.

The scenario is therefore that of a government which not only scrutinizes the private lives of citizens in search of compromising information, but then discloses it to the media in its service, to the prosecution and to its senior political officials. so they can use it, criminally, against their opposition rivals.

The panic of Lobato, who has already had three versions of events in just twelve hours, is therefore understandable.

Firstly because he knows that he has not betrayed just anyone, but someone capable of destroying his rivals by using all the resources, legal and presumed, of the political and media apparatus available to everyone. President of the Government.

Second, because he knows his political career is dead. Lobato is no more. The error is stratospheric. Lobato, of course, is not Machiavelli.

Third, because we are not talking about a political scandal, but a scandal with serious criminal repercussions. For at least three government ministers, for the Attorney General and for Pedro Sánchez himself.

Juan Lobatowho stabbed the President of the Government believing that he was stabbing Oscar Lopezit is now impossible to deny the obvious.

That he went to the notary after the state attorney general’s accusation because he was panicking at the idea of ​​justice coming to him because of the leak of his boyfriend’s personal information. Ayuso.

Lobato then wanted to distance himself from the “Kill Ayuso” operation without realizing that this simple gesture, asking for an appointment with the notary so that he could attest to his innocence, This is proof of the existence of the dirty war of Moncloa.

Proof also of the distrust that exists today among the members of the PSOE themselves. The PSOE is clearly in decay and the spectacle is hypnotic. Dirty, grotesque and even nasty. But hypnotic.

It is normal that Spanish citizens refuse to believe the above. Because this places us in a scenario very close to that of the dirty war of the 1980s.

And I’m not talking about the dirty war against ETA, although that too. I am talking about the war that the PSOE waged, using the most dangerous elements in the sewers of the state, against journalists who investigated their crimes and against other uncomfortable citizens.

Only now they no longer resort to atrabiliary elements of the state security forces and organs, but rather to prosecutors, journalists, regional barons and political commanders of the state security forces and organs. ‘State.

Lobato, as it could not be otherwise, has already been summoned by the judge in charge of the investigation into the leak of Ayuso’s boyfriend’s data. You have the possibility of presenting the notarial deed, which would release you from any liability, but in exchange he would give it to Óscar López and Pedro Sánchez.

The question is why Lobato, faced with the obvious commission of a crime by Moncloa, did not file a complaint at the police station and preferred to contact a notary?