Ines Schverdnner, the leader of the left faction, said: “Although we took care of our relatives, they took care of themselves: with contacts, transactions and billions from our tax money.” Instead of clarifying the incidents, Span now washes his hands in innocence. The fact that parliamentarians would receive a version of the report that was blackened over large parts is a “target attempt to sell parliament for stupidity.”
The new Minister of Health and a colleague from the Spani Party Nina Warken provided a censorship document available to members of the budget committee on Tuesday morning. 5 pages of 170 pages are completely blackened, others are largely part of it. In the entire document, names, sources and individual sentences are always censored. Especially those pages that relate to direct purchases of masks are kept by the ministry under the closure. In particular, we are talking about business with the Swiss company EMIX.
For the current hour in the Bundestag, the budget committee, where Span was interviewed, interrupted his meeting. In the morning, Warken was already invited to the healthcare committee and answered questions about the Sudhof report.
The investigation committee is currently unlikely
Greens and Linka criticized the appearance of a new minister in the health committee: “Instead of enlightenment, there were excuses,” said the representative of the green -health policy of the green Janos Dammen. Varking was about the “protection” of her friend -Party of Span. You could not answer central questions about the role of Span in the committee.
Asse Gurpinara, on the left of the health committee, doubted the appearance of Warken that without investigation we could experience a complete explanation of abuse of power and corruption during the Apandemia of the Crown. ”
The investigation committee, as required by greens and left, may be inconvenient for span. But without AFD, the support of which you do not want, both factions do not have the necessary quorum of 25 percent. And until now, the SPD was loyal to the Union of the Coalition Partner: “The investigation commission is the right tool for objective processing of the crown period and attracting teaching for the future,” says the first managing parliamentary director of SPD, Dirk Visa, and on the press conference on Wednesday. He believes that the theme of purchases of the mask will also play a role.
But, most likely, subordinates, in addition to big questions about the closure of schools and the obligation of vaccination. In addition, unlike the investigation, the investigation commission does not investigate its own investigation; Thus, Span may be sure that the theme of masks sank again in the commission.
The Union helps Span where he can
The union can successfully defend itself from parliamentary control. Bundestag President Julia Klekner (CDU) also, apparently, wants to encourage this: a small request from greenery to the federal government on the wording of the SUDHOF report should not send it to the federal government, since the editorial network Germany reported that this would be unusual behavior for the president of parliament in parliament.
In addition to blackened positions, the Sudhof report was probably edited, for example South German Newspaper Its journalists have reported in advance of the reports of the report and provided the sides on the side.
Accordingly, such proposals as: “The team has been repeatedly welcomed with a proposal in a document that is currently available. Also, there was no statement that it was “obvious” that the Ministry of Health could not distribute protective equipment.
The continuation in this case follows: another parliamentary discussion should take place on Thursday.
