The complaint filed against Ayuso’s partner was sent to the courts before the scandal broke. This is what the prosecution defends in court. UCO Report which indicates that the Attorney General had a “a preeminent participation” in the leak of emails reported by Alberto González Amador, partner of Madrid president Isabel Díaz Ayuso, about his tax fraud agreement with the parquet.
Sources from the Public Ministry tell laSexta that on February 20, the provincial prosecutor of Madrid sent the complaint against Alberto González Amador to the dean of courts and that on March 5, the dean’s office registered it. Thus, they insist that on March 7 the complaint was filed with the Tax Agency, as indicated in the case that was followed before the TSJM. In other words, the complaint was filed a few days before the news was published in the media on February 12.
Furthermore, the prosecution emphasizes that “Filing a complaint is not a crime” and that “if it is a relevant cause of informative interest, the information is made public.”
Concerning the report of the Central Operational Unit (UCO), the Prosecutor’s Office ensures that “provides no evidence”. In this document, to which LaSexta had access, the agents chronologically trace “all communications between the Attorney General of the province, Pilar Rodríguez, with other members of the Prosecutor’s Office in relation to the events investigated” and emphasize that the lawyer Le general had a “preeminent participation” in the leak.
Investigators respected the deadline set by the judge in charge of investigating the case at the Supreme Court, which runs from March 8 to 14 of this month.
From the analysis of the intercepted communications, investigators conclude that “from 9:59 p.m., the time when the state attorney general received an email he needed and which contained the one that was ultimately disclosed, and until that the leak was published at Around 11:51 p.m., there are only a very small number of people” who have access to “all the emails between the prosecution and the defense lawyer” and who know, not only that the ministry public prepares a “statement”, but of the “approximate time frame within which it will be published”.
Regarding emails, the prosecution ensures that forget the publication of the Sixthprior to the Cadena SER, and “the legal obligation of prosecutors to report important matters to superiors”.
Precisely, the key is found in the information given by laSexta on March 13 at 10:10 p.m. LaSexta then dismantled the hoax promoted by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Ayuso’s chief of staff, confirming that it was his partner and not the prosecution who proposed the famous pact to avoid prison.
Thus, laSexta published that Alberto González Amador’s lawyer, Carlos Neira, had proposed to the Madrid public prosecutor’s office a compliance agreement that encompassed the two crimes of tax fraud before the complaint was filed against Isabel’s associate Díaz Ayuso for fraud of 350,000 euros with a corporate network and false invoices. .
.
