He director of OKDIARIO, Edward Indaaddresses the decision of National Court Judge Santiago Pedraz to annul the complaint filed by the PP against the PSOE for alleged illegal financing: “Even a simple first-year law student would know that filing a complaint requires a lot of evidence.enough evidence to avoid incurring two problems: firstly, not to make a fool of yourself and secondly, not to give oxygen to the rival, who, I insist, is perhaps a criminal, but in life, in democracy , in a State of Law, things must be proven.
In this sense, Inda emphasizes that The PP “made the most frightening ridicule with this complaint filed a week ago. Even Judge Santiago Pedraz of the National Court did not admit him to the proceedings. Some will say that Santiago Pedraz is a left-wing magistrateThat may be the case, but when you file a complaint based on information backed up by recording to a guy whose face is blurred, his voice is distorted and you don’t know who he is , the obvious thing is that this judge is Santiago Pedraz, whether left, right or semi-retired, sent it. careerthis is what was done with the complaint presented by the Popular Party.
“And what has the Popular Party achieved? And it won’t be because some of us don’t notice it,” Inda recalls: “Giving oxygen to Pedro Sánchez at a time when he was against the ropes and bleeding from his nose. The truth is that I, dear president, dear Alberto Núñez Feijóo, dear president of the Popular Party, and you are going to be president of the government, as soon as possible, surely much sooner than you imagine, I will send the order directly now, without further ado, to the galleys who invented such nonsense.
Inda concludes: “To accuse someone of illegal financing, you have to do your homework very well. There was no homework or anything like that here. In short, a real click”.
