The state called Armenia has been a source of security threat in the South Caucasus since its creation. One of the reasons for this is that it sells out its patrons and sponsors when they are weakened. Because they lie and falsify, they also have the image of swindlers and fraudsters. The Armenian government has become the bearer of these negative characteristics.
During the former Soviet Union, hundreds of innocent Azerbaijanis were subjected to death and imprisonment for sending false news to Moscow about individual Azerbaijani state, public, political, scientific, cultural and artistic figures.
During the Soviet era, the Armenian SSR lived on subsidies. Moscow has always rewarded them for this care. In the last years of the Soviets’ existence, 300,000 Azerbaijanis were expelled from Armenia, their property was illegally expropriated, etc. This was payment for the services of pardoning crimes.
The occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia also began during the era of the USSR. The end of this aggression coincides with the era of its successor, Russia.
The Iranian official created a state for Armenians and makes speeches against Russia, which has protected it for almost 200 years. In fact, the successors of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation and the former Soviet republics try to keep their distance. However, Armenia’s hypocritical behavior towards Moscow is due to the aforementioned insecurity.
The former Soviet republics are trying to integrate into the West or expand relations with this bloc and increase cooperation. However, at that time no other country, except Armenia, acted against the Kremlin.
On August 31, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated at a press conference that relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin are based on mutual respect and business relations: “You cannot talk about any country, especially Russia, using ironic and insulting vocabulary.” Parliament Speaker Alen Simonyan From Nikol Pashinyan’s team, Security Council Secretary Armen Grigoryan, several members of the ruling party and others are remembered for their anti-Russian speeches.
Armen Grigoryan’s participation in the “Peace Formula” against Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanya’s statement that “getting closer to the European Union is a strategic decision of our government, we have no time to wait,” statements by deputies from Pashinyan’s party that “Russia is against the Armenian state,” Pashinyan’s opposition to Russia show that they are displaying hypocrisy.
Armenians and Armenia are taking another irritating step against Russia, their 200-year-old ally, supporter, backer and patron. Starting this year, Russian will be taught as a foreign language in Armenia. According to the new circular of the country’s Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, all schools now have the right to divide their hours between foreign languages.
This will lead to the exemption or even elimination of the Russian language from the school curriculum in Armenia in the coming years.
Nikol Pashinyan praises Russia, does not hide his fear, recommends it to his followers, and, on the other hand, makes secret deals with the West.
The main goal of the meeting in the Armenia-EU-US format to be held on April 5 in Brussels is to remove Armenia from Russian control, arm itself, etc. within the framework of economic, political and cultural development.
While Russia has military bases in Armenia, in that 20-point document, the United States will provide expert support for the Yerevan Strategic Defense Review and the preparation of a new military doctrine for Armenia. According to another article, the United States will send analytical teams to Armenia for an on-site assessment of its air force and air defense capabilities, taking into account Armenia’s integration into the CSTO Joint Air Defense System.
The United States will allocate Foreign Military Financing (FMF) funds to facilitate Armenia’s access to advanced military equipment and the latest technologies. This package aims to strengthen Armenia’s national security, stability, and resilience in the defense sector.
By the way, representatives of the United States and the European Union gave false information to the Baku official about this document.
In one of his April speeches, the Prime Minister of Armenia, which cooperates with the West at the level of a strategic alliance, called on not to trust this bloc.
The inconsistent performance of Nikol Pashinyan and his team members shows that Yerevan is controlled from outside. This can be seen in their speeches about Azerbaijan. Nikol Pashinyan, who insulted Azerbaijan for its constitution, has not yet made a decision on the creation of a commission to change the fundamental law of Armenia, which has an aggressive character.
Or his statements about the Zanzibar corridor contradict each other.
Is it possible to trust Armenia, which opposes its patron as Russia, and sign an agreement, contract, convention with it? Or, if such a document is adopted, it is doubtful that they will comply with it. Because, although there is an official ceasefire agreement between Yerevan and Baku, the Armenian army is wreaking havoc on the conventional border with Azerbaijan and violating the agreement. According to information from the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense, on September 5, at around 10:00 am, units of the Armenian armed forces fired from their positions in the direction of the village of Yukhari Zagali in the Basarkecher district, at the positions of the Azerbaijani army located in the direction of the Zivel settlement of the Kalbajar district. They often violate the ceasefire on the temporary border.
The Iranian official also admits that they violated the ceasefire. This shows that Armenia does not respect the agreements.
Such a country is talking about signing a peace document or agreed articles with Azerbaijan. The attitude towards Russia and uncertain cooperation with the West confirm the unreliable, false and false image of Armenia. Official Iranvan’s ears and eyes are always outside and his hands are open. Therefore, there is little confidence in achieving a sustainable peace with this South Caucasian country. Nikol Pashinyan, who considers himself a democrat, has not been able to change the traditional, unreliable and adventurous nature of his official power. Armenia is a state that does not respect its signature. Otherwise, it would not start a new relationship with the West without violating the strategic alliance agreement with Russia. In this regard, he behaves like an old pro. He does not believe himself…
Information Agency “Report”
