OUR Constitution declares in its article 24 that everyone has the right to presumption of innocence until his guilt is proven. We are therefore faced with an essential guarantee, a fundamental right frequently violated. Pedro Sánchez called Víctor de Aldama a “suspected criminal”, a concept that in itself is a aberration because in our legal system there is the presumption of innocence, but not the presumption that the President of the Government attributes to the leader of the Koldo plot, unless he understands that someone whose role is to carry out the he subject of investigation in a criminal case deserves to be punished. so-called qualification.
It is not a matter of defending Aldama -this Government has already done so when it distinguished him with the highest decoration of the Civil Guard-, but to emphasize that if for Pedro Sanchez Aldama is an “alleged criminal”, his wife, Begoña Gomez, and his brother David They are also “suspected criminals”, since four charges weigh on the first – influence peddling, corporate corruption, embezzlement and intrusion – and on the second, four others -prevarication, influence peddling, embezzlement and tax fraud.
Pedro Sánchez’s family, by extension, is made up of “suspected criminals”. Not because I say so OKDIARIO, but because it is the interpretation made by the President of the Government of the accused Aldama, to whom the presumption of innocence recognized by the Constitution has been replaced by that of “a suspected criminal.”
This newspaper has always been very respectful of constitutional guarantees and, therefore, we have always talked about Begoña Gomez and of David Sanchez as under investigation – or accused, according to the previous definition – but as Pedro Sánchez makes clear that a person under investigation – see Aldama – is automatically a “suspected criminal”, his woman and her brother, due to the number of charges against them, should be “presumptive” tetra-criminals. This is not a joke, but to warn Sánchez of what he has at home.
