“Madrid City Hall will inform Real Madrid today the need to execute stopping work, adopting safety measures in advance and replacing the surface so as not to harm mobility in the environment”, reported sources from the Government Department of Urban Planning, Environment and Mobility after took note yesterday of the judicial resolution concerning the execution of the judgment of the 30th Contentious-Administrative Court of May 23 concerning the work in the Santiago Bernabéu parking lot.
The same sources report that the deadline for the the execution of the sentence is ten days. Real Madrid must adopt these measures without prejudice to any appeal that may be filed against this decision.
“Without prejudice to the fact that we are studying the possible appeal We respect this judicial resolution as we did with the sentence and it is going to be executed because the Madrid City Council in this case may or may not share a sentence or a judicial resolution, but in any case we must respect it and we must comply with it and that This is what we are going to do, declared the mayor of Madrid this morning.
This judgment, dated May 23, confirmed the appeal of the Bernabéu Wounded Neighborhood Association against the agreement of the Directing Council of March 9, 2023 which authorized the works concession contract for the construction and operation of the Paseo de la Castellana-Bernabéu and Padre Damián car parks.
Since this decision was not final and the municipality and Real Madrid appealed to the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid, the cessation of work had not been made effectivethe neighbors concerned therefore appealed with the intention that this sentence would come to fruition and that the work would stop.
As indicated in the judicial resolution, signed last Wednesday, the judge has now agreed that “in provisional execution of the aforementioned sentence, the suspension of the works is ordered”, whose administrative authorization had been canceled and because the continuation of the same “he does not have the relevant administrative justification “who authorized them and contravenes the resolution of the aforementioned judgment.”
