THE Board of Directors and Council of Spokespersons of the Parliament of Navarre finally processed this Monday at movement who presented Voice against the illegal immigration and that he had initially refused to debate it. In fact, the PSN filed a complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office considering that the motion could represent a hate crimebut the complaint was filed.
Vox presented a resource before the Bureau of the Parliament of Navarra for the refusal to process this motion. Initially, PSN, EH Bildu, Geroa Bai And With you-Zurekin supported that the motion not be processed, while UPN And PPN They were in favor of it being debated. This Monday, in response to Vox’s call, the Council and the Council of Spokespersons agreed to handle it with the sole abstention by EH Bildu.
Vox spokesperson, Maïté Nostistressed that the groups “decided to admit the request, they do not want to have legal problems, because if they had not admitted it, we would have gone to courts“.
UPN spokesperson, Javier Esparzadeclared that at Socialist Party “He takes a strong Vox and gives it a voice and a speaker.” “The PSN must talk about Vox and in a manner strategy perfectly defined. What you do is give political visibility. They knew very well that their complaint was going to be filed and we all know that if this motion had been debated, it would have passed without pain or glory for that. Camerawould have obtained a very significant number of votes against and would not make the headlines Monday after Monday,” he said.
Thus, he insisted that “socialists have brought together a number to give strength, political visibility and political weight to Vox” and argued that “all the strength acquired by Vox can be lost by d ‘other political groups’. “We are the first strength in Navarre and the PSN would like to be the first force”, he added.
The PSN spokesperson, Ramon Alzorrizstressed that the prosecutor, in his decision, “does not evaluate the complaint and says that, basically, since it was not processed, it could not be debated, since it did not been debated, it could not be debated. It was possible to approve it, and although it is not approved, it does not envisage that there could be a crime. “We do not agree. We respect the decision, but we do not agree. We believe that since this initiative has been placed on the register of Parliament, there is hate crime“, he stressed.
In any case, Alzórriz indicated that “we do not regret” having filed the complaint. “We do not regret having defended the human rights. We do not regret having made it clear that the PSOE will under no circumstances, or in any way, allow these hate crimes to be ignored. And we will continue to put a stop to these types of behaviors, motions and speeches. It can only be permitted in a democratic institution hatred is encouraged. And that’s what Vox is doing in this Parliament,” he criticized.
On the other hand, he criticized the fact that the prosecutor’s decision was “leaked”. “The decision was only communicated to Socialist Party and the Socialist Party He did not disclose it to any media. We only knew prosecutor’s office and the current spokesperson, who is the one who presented the complaint with his identity card. I didn’t say anything. So here there was a filtration. And I think it’s serious, because it’s a sensitive issue, and even more so in these times, in an area as important as that of hate crimes,” he stressed.
Ramon Alzorriz indicated that “due to a leak, the State Attorney General“We’re not saying we’re going to sue him, far from it. We say that there are two parties, the prosecution and the Socialist Party, and the Socialist Party has not opened its mouth, that’s what I said, each to assert their conclusions” he said.
However, he did not respond to a question about whether he was saying the prosecutor’s office had disclosed its decision. “What I say is what I say. There are two main actors, one is the Socialist Party and me as the spokesperson, who registered the complaint, and another is the Prosecutor’s Office. I have not passed on the communication I have to anyone. “Everyone draws their own conclusions,” he said.
The parliamentarian of EH Bildu, Adolfo Araizexplained that his group, which ultimately decided to abstain, “thought about how to avoid becoming a victim” of Vox, “avoiding that the refusal to deal with its motion could give more voice to its content , because we understand that it has arrived.” “Our parliamentary group continues to defend the need to apply a sanitary cordon At extreme right and will continue to vote against his initiatives racist And xenophobicas we will do with this motion,” he noted.
The spokesperson for Geroa Bai, Pablo Azconaindicated that his coalition had finally decided to support the handling of the motion in the face of the statement from the floor and announced that it would vote against Vox’s proposal during its debate in the House. Azcona justified the initial rejection of the initiative being processed because “we believe that there is important data that speaks of hate speech in this motion and we believe that it is important to combat it from the beginning “.
The parliamentarian of PPN, Irene Royoexplained that his group was in favor of the debate on the motion and indicated that, with the rejection of his admission for treatment, “we opened a melon that we had not opened until now, it was a very dangerous to start canceling the debates in this Parliament.” “We hope that whoever started this path will stop, because it is not the path proper to a democracy,” he said.
The spokesperson for With you-Zurekin, Miguel Garridoindicated that they had initially voted against processing this initiative because they understood that “there could be a hate crime”, but “the prosecution ruled by filing the PSN complaint”, so “we understand that we have an obligation to process the motion, despite the fact that the content of the message seems to us abominable“. “We consider that there is hatred in this message. Another thing is if there is a crime. We are handling the prosecutor’s case,” he said.
