TAZ: Mr. Ruch, why is this enough to take the AFD to the word to prove your anti -constitutionality?
Philip Ruch: Some of the AFD ads are checked. You just want to scream. When I studied more carefully, I noticed that at that time it was no different. They are strange for screams. The only problem is that the Nazis are not comedians. Those who say what they say. While national socialism announced that he was engaged, this was a great source of entertainment for the majority. Yes, in the end it was not so funny.
TAZ: In your book, you draw parallels with the situation at the end of the Republic of Weimar, when people could not imagine that figures such as Goering and Hitler are obtaining power. Are there any similar mechanisms of displacement today?
RUCH: They are the same: who can imagine that these roaring, vulgar policies of AFD with a beer belly as a Minister of Justice? We must imagine this as a federal minister. Then it becomes clearer why the Nazis can translate their obsessive ideas into a human hunting policy. The fact that we find this is absurd is protecting the political project of the AFD: the destruction of democracy.
Painting:
Glen Glover
In an interview: Philip Ruch
Born in 1981, an artist -beoevik, is the founder of the Center for Political Beauty. Book: “This is 5 to 1933”, Ludwig Verlag, Munich; 224 pp., 16 euros, e -book: 10 euros.
Taz: On the other hand, they write that at that time the resistance of the enemies of democracy was stronger.
RUCH: My favorite example is the Minister of Bavarian Internal Affairs Karl Steutsel, an unconditional hero of defensive democracy. As the Minister of the Interior, Sutzel announced against Hitler: “Relying on him, we will shoot against the Nazis, if it is necessary one day.” On the contrary, our current Minister of Internal Affairs Dobrindt is a dwarf. The Weimar Republic fought with the NSDAP militant when our state today is AFD. We are literally tamed against AFD.
TAZ: And bourgeois forces do not take danger seriously, because not that they, except minorities, are attacked – just like then?
RUCH: Absolutely. With militant anti -marksism, NSDAP received a lot of votes. By the way, this meant fewer communists than SPD. Then the bourgeois camp thought: it is wonderful, like on the hat of the working party. This did not even notice that it was next time.
TAZ: You also write about AFDLER anti -democratic behavior in parliaments. What do you mean?
RUCH: AFD sends the same variety of people to parliaments as NSDAP: crazy, spans, screaming necks, absolutely uneducated, offenders. For two years, the elected member of AFD Bundestag was sitting in Karlsruhe as the leader of the terrorist group in prison, which scored positions in the Bundestag building with his accomplices from which they wanted to organize a coup. In 2021, we were closer to the forced absorption of AFD, which we all think. The Prosecutor General did not find it ridiculous. This, ignored by the public, leads the greatest mass processes against the terrorist group since the Air Force.
TAZ: You accuse the comfort of a bourgeois society due to the danger from AFD. What do you mean?
RUCH: Merz and Dobrindt believe that AFD is a useful extremist idiots with which they can intimidate political opponents, especially SPD and green. This is just the strategy of the bourgeois camp since 1930. He brought the world to the Holocaust.
Literary salon “Forbid AFD! AFD prohibits?” With monika Grutters and Philip Ruch: Monday, 7.7 in the morning, 8 p.m.
TAZ: And what does SPD want to check the trial to prohibit AFD, is not a step in the right direction?
RUCH: These are theatrical events to save us calm. As in the case of NSDAP, AFD depends on maintaining the riots. The party will probably become the first prime minister next year. The country is not yet clear what it means. Everything will change – to the negative.
