Pedro SanchezGovernment ministers and some socialist members guarantee that PSOE stops corruption forcibly, that the executive leader confirmed during his speech in the Federal Committee. But this did not avoid the fact that long faces were noticed in Ferraz and critical words against the government of the government, as usual, was led, as usual Emiliano Garcia-PigField
Upon arrival at the Socialist Headquarters in Madrid, President Castilla-la Mancha I asked to go out as a real measure to combat corruptionThe field and, if not, he explained to the media that the socialist direction will be “part of the problem”.
He did not explain whether one of these exits should be Pedro Sanchez, but, of course, the effectiveness shone with his absence when listening to the intervention of the socialist secretary. He did not applaud him, and, in addition, he and his entire delegation were the only ones who did not rise At the end of his speech, in order to applaud him.
Far from there, President Manhego asked for a change of word and talked with the socialists. And, at the same time, and, as Lassta found out, he handed Sanchez that he had only two options after a serdan explosion: go through the question of trust or put out electionsThe field “On trust, which was lost without more blackmail of independent or elections, is restored. The seriousness of the crisis is not resolved in this committee, ”he said in a speech.
In addition, he also confirmed the request for marches in PSOE. “I know that you did not know this, but you are responsible, and you must give exits,” he said. And, as he made Sanchez, the socialists did not applaud maneche at the end of their attacks on the president of the government.
The page is especially critical of Sanchez And long before this party crisis. Perhaps for this he was the most intense entrance to Ferras, as he was accepted with a bead group that was waiting at the exit of Ferraras to provide “support to the government.” A group that a clearly angry page described as a “picket”.
Although he was also angry with which he considers the most “serious case of corruption from the point of view of organic corruption” and with the side with which it guarantees that communication can be improved, because, according to him, he usually learns about the appointments and decisions of the media.
In short, the socialist directive asked for a hard hand and He wanted him to leave this committee with the confidence that there were no more dirty rags than they already knowField
