Home Top Stories Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Minister María Jesús Montero in the Supreme Court and...

Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Minister María Jesús Montero in the Supreme Court and demands 40,000 euros

33
0
Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Minister María Jesús Montero in the Supreme Court and demands 40,000 euros

Alberto Gonzalez Amador, boyfriend of the president of Madrid Isabel Diaz Ayusosued the First Vice President and Minister of Finance in the Supreme Court, Maria Jesus Montero, by illegitimate interference with his right to honor and claim it for that 40,000 euros.

As judicial sources confirmed to EL ESPAÑOL, González Amador chose to go to the Supreme Court after Montero did not attend the October 2 conciliation ceremony summoned to a court in Madrid after the trial brought by Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend in relation to certain statements by the minister regarding the alleged tax crime committed by him.

The act of conciliation, in which it is proposed to reach an agreement to avoid the trial, was summoned before the Court of First Instance number 49 of Madrid and since no one showed up from Montero’s side, it was lousy, and now González Amador She chose to take the case to the Supreme Court because she is the qualified vice-president.

The lawsuit focuses specifically on statements made by Montero on March 12 and October 3, 23 and 24 of this year, according to the sources consulted.

González Amador announced this trial due to the words spoken by Montero during the control session in the Senate on March 12, where he declared that the president of Madrid could “Living in an apartment paid for fraudulently.”

The first vice president made these statements in reference to journalistic information that advanced the Madrid prosecutor’s complaint against Ayuso’s partner for a alleged tax fraud greater than 350,000 euros and that the regional president was staying in an apartment worth €1 million which was paid for after the Treasury investigated her partner.

González Amador’s defense then announced several proceedings against Montero for insulting his honor and revealing secrets after learning some of his tax information, in addition to another complaint against the prosecution for the note distributed in which the agreement concluded with the Treasury in which he recognized the authorship of the commission of two offenses against the Public Treasury for corporate tax.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here