Home Breaking News Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Montero in Supreme Court, demands compensation of 40,000 euros

Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Montero in Supreme Court, demands compensation of 40,000 euros

29
0
Ayuso’s boyfriend sues Montero in Supreme Court, demands compensation of 40,000 euros

He Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend presented the trial he announced against the Minister of Finance, María Jesús Montero, for illegitimate infringement of her right to honor. In the lawsuit, presented before the First Chamber of the Supreme Court due to the legal status of the minister, González Amador asks Montero compensation of 40,000 euros.

The cause of the trial lies in the statements made by Montero on March 12 in which he stated that González Amador could “living in an apartment paid for fraudulently”. The lawsuit was filed after Montero failed to appear at the October 2 conciliation ceremony held at the court.

The act of conciliation, in which it is proposed to reach an agreement to avoid the trial, was summoned before the Court of First Instance number 49 of Madrid and since no one showed up on Montero’s side, it was void , and now González Amador She chose to take it to the Supreme Court, because she is the qualified vice president. THE The lawsuit focuses specifically on statements Montero made on March 12 and October 3, 23 and 24 of this year, according to the sources consulted.

Montero during the control session in the Senate on March 12, where he declared that the Madrid president could “live in an apartment paid for fraudulently.” The first vice-president made these statements in reference to journalistic information that advanced the Madrid prosecutor’s complaint against the couple. Ayuso for alleged tax fraud exceeding 350,000 euros and that The regional president lived in an apartment worth a million euros who was paid after the Treasury investigated his partner.

González Amador’s defense then announced several charges against Montero for insulting honor and for revealing secrets after having read some of his tax data, in addition to another complaint against the Prosecutor’s Office for the note distributed in which he reported on the agreement concluded with the Treasury in which he recognized the paternity of the commission of two crimes against the Public Treasury for the Corporate Tax.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here