If you think about it, it is difficult to hear Isabel Díaz Ayuso speak for more than two minutes at a time. You may have seen her statements at a press conference, in an interview with Losantos or Ana Rosa, on friendly terms, or in a video clip that circulates on social networks. In these decontextualized or limited conditions, it is very difficult to understand the sociological absurdity that an unquestionable leadership like that of Isabel Díaz Ayuso implies.
Listening to Ayuso several times and for a long time is a more intense intellectual experience than reading and understanding Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Listening to her for forty minutes straight in the debate, trying to make sense of her words even when she improvises, requires all your attention. It is as if you were trying to listen to the radio very quietly, you force yourself not to lose the meaning of the story. It is tiring. Their sentences are disjointed, meaningless, disjointed and lacking in coherence, they destroy all the codes of good communication and the frameworks that we give ourselves so that there is understanding. You try to put yourself in his shoes to understand what he is saying, to try to understand what emotion he wants to arouse in his electorate, and it is useless. It is a vain work because there is no intellectual development in their chatter. Using reason to understand semantically what Ayuso is saying is useless.
