Congress lay on Tuesday an attempt by PP and VOKS to protect the extreme right agitators accredited in the lower ward. The parliamentary groups of the investment block rejected the amendments to the right and the extreme right against the regulation reform, which seeks to authorize the behavior of these pseudo -demoans, which daily and without impunity violates the normal work of journalists, indicate them in their social networks and boycott the press conferences.
Both amendments received a vote against 174 deputies and the support of 166 seats from the right bench and the extreme right. The plans of the parties that lead to reform must convey the final voice to the extraordinary plenary meeting, which will be held on July 22.
The alternative proposal PP defended him Cayetana áalvarez de Toledo. Or it was an idea, because the deputy press secretary barely spoke about the regulation reform, the cause of the debate and used her time (superior to noticeable) to attack the government and cases of corruption, which, presumably, affect it.
Alvarez de Toledo ignored that the regulation reform is an issue approved by the Association of Parliamentary Journalists, and not in groups, did not mention a single line of amendment to the replacement. The formula that does not offer the proposed text, but raises an alternative. The deputy press secretary of the PP parapeted for El Pau and its editor, in a hurry or leading anu rose Kintan, in order not to position themselves on those who use their accreditation in the congress, to indicate and try to intimidate the deputies who are not pleasure, but also to information professionals, yes. Some of them, such as Javier Negro, a special guest at the recent National Congress XXI. Vito Quiles was also invited to the subsequent party organized by new generations.
For the PP, the deputy seemed to be not interested in these debates and decided to talk about Pedro Sanchez, his feminism or mainly from the PSOE between the links to the “West” and the foreboding: “Have you read polls that will happen when there will be a different majority?”
Meanwhile, the extreme right raised these agitators as journalists who ask “uncomfortable questions” and at the same time accuse of the fact that he, in his opinion, is the “government of the Lamiiboth Del”. Among these “slave” editors are the majority of the media, any sign and political trend, but unlike previous respected shifts of the word and norms of coexistence of the congress.
The deputy VOX, who defended the position of the party, Jose Maria Figaredo, barely used a minute to talk about the problem that was discussed at the plenary meeting of this Tuesday. He accused 99% of the journalists of the EnSobrados Congress and censored that the government wants to “expel” those who ask uncomfortable questions. The norm does not begin with the executive branch, but with a dozen parliamentary groups, which are significantly in the lower ward and intend to throw awkward editors, and those who do not respect the basic norms of behavior.
Both PP and Figaredo excluded, with regard to the real content of the reform, which is approved by the main associations of journalists in the country: insulting these extreme right -wing activists for politicians and other employees of other media, as well as signals of these classmates through their social networks with thousands of followers. The VOX deputy chose to talk about the “corruption” of the government or make their usual racist speeches. And he complained that such a problem forced him to work in July, a month, not qualified in the congress.
“This does not get out of consideration,” said John Inarrit, Deputy Eh of Build. “There are awkward questions that all journalists should ask them are examples of journalists who do their work every day, even media journalists who more than criticize the government and charged and insults,” he defended. “They are not looking for news, but generate it by tearing out the press conferences,” added the deputy, who asked PP whether to create a patriotic police to produce evidence against other political leaders and filter them in the media, “free journalism”.
“Whoever pursues some, who only take an interview from some, explores some, worries some, and not everyone, does not make information, they are propaganda. They are propagandists, then they do not fit here. They hope to receive orders, ”said the ERC representative Gabriel Rufin, pointing to the right bench. The republican deputy sent directly to this Influential facesSitting in the rostrum of journalists during the debate to ask them whether they went to all these months to the El Ventorro restaurant, where the Generalitat president ate for hours in the middle of the crisis of Dana, who entered the 228 lives last year in the Valancyan community.
The regulation reform was increased in March the main groups of the investment block. PSOE, Sumar, ERC, JUNTS, BILDU, PNV, Podemos, BNG and Canary Coalition signed the proposal of the law that is aimed at reforming Article 98 of the regime of sanctions from these accredited persons as journalists who do not carry out minimal critical criteria. It includes the sanctioning regime, which distinguishes minor, serious and very serious violations, which can lead to the final removal of funds.
Reform seeks to prevent scenes that are already common in the spaces where journalists work. Just a few weeks ago, the editors had to leave the press room during one of the wheels after the Council of representatives after continuous breaks of people such as Vito Quiles, accredited by pseudo -aids in the Middle Javier Neer, EDATV. A few days later, the media workers prepared after another of them, Bertrand Nadono, will again boycott the wheel.
These types of activists who carry questions, the arguments of the extreme law and who were connected or followed with such parties as VOX or the party, at the end of the aliza Perez, they usually use their social networks to distort these episodes and publicly indicate journalists who complain of their behavior and lie on them.
A little more than a month ago, Kuels participated in a conversation in Zhegos with the leader of Sol, with whom he applauded his proposals. His name was in the lists of this ultra -right political formation in the lists of the latest European elections.
Insults and disqualification, very serious crimes
The regulation reform distinguishes various types of disorders. The authorization of details that mild violations will be authorized by a warning and, if necessary, the suspension of authority up to ten working days. These serious violations will be authorized with the suspension of powers for ten days to three months. And these very serious violations will entail the suspension of powers for three months to five years or, where it is appropriate, with the final reviews of communication.
In this sentence, they rise in the form of minor violations: the omission of the information required when applying authority and access to the total spaces of parliamentary investment outside those that were limited by representatives of the media without mandatory permission.
As serious violations: the inclusion of false information in the application for accounting data, recording images or sounds without the resolution of the camera or outside the spaces included for this, access to reserved spaces, such as the offices or areas of the meeting, the parliamentary corps outside those that were limited to representatives of the media without mandatory resolution.
A few days ago, QUILES was recorded during an appeal without an accrediting sticker in one of the units of the congress, in which it is forbidden to record without explicit permission. The agitator passed access to security without permission to the insuriality of the police forces who guarded this space to question the former socialist minister Jose Luis Abalaros.
It is also believed that serious crimes interrupt the order of press conferences or other meetings of members of the chamber with media representatives; publication in the media and social networks of images obtained in accordance with applicable rules; Any other behavior that harm the activity of the camera or the work of other media representatives.
Meanwhile, among violations proposed as very serious, in detail: the lack of respect or the rules of politeness to other people in the areas of the parliamentary fence and access to it. “In any case, a very serious violation will be considered insults, disqualifications or an attempt against the dignity of other people in the cell and in access to it,” it was indicated.
They will also be very serious violations ”“ Recording images or sounds using hidden devices or in the offices of the camera members and in areas intended for parliamentary groups, and recording images or sounds without the resolution of the camera or outside the spaces included for it, which contain personal data or violate the proximity of people. ”
