Controversial freedom of expression of Mr. Couils’s opinions

Nowadays, the reform of the regulation of the congress of deputies has been discussed, which, among other things, introduces a list of violations that are accredited as journalists in the ward, and this can be authorized even when their powers are withdrawn. In colloquial speech, the media relate to the initiative, indicating that she seeks to throw pseudo -periodists from the parliament. They usually personify in the r -on Vito Kuels, a citizen and a political activist who enjoys the access of Congress. Thus, this may seem an unconstitutional attempt to make a critical press to shut up. Nevertheless, it is discussed, this is how to prevent anyone from having one of these accounting data for use for illegal activities outside the journalistic profession.

The expression “Pseudoperiodista” won in public debate. This success does not necessarily implies that this is a clear category. We make a serious mistake if we use it to designate those informants who, in our opinion, do not use their profession with the necessary ethics or devotion. In this case, pseudo -periods are always the rest. Those who do not write and do not ask what we want, and how we would like.

Leave a Comment