This did not take much time, there were proposals that still caused excitement. It is not surprising that the topic included all trigger words that can create headlines: the upper limit, migration and school. In the end, this was said on the web -site “Tagesschau:” Princess openly for migration quota in schools. “
The integration of the federal government, Natalie Pavlik, immediately rejected this idea. “Germany does not need a quota in the classroom,” said SPD politician. The educational politician of the left, Nicole Golka, spoke about “populist banalities.” The requirement of the flat upper limit “only political failure.”
ALADIN EL-MAFAALANI, a researcher in education, noted that the implementation of such a restriction will mean that most of the children can no longer be trained close to the house ”and that some will have to“ transfer to other parts of the city ”. In addition, such a quota cannot be implemented purely mathematically, ”he wrote on Instagram. In the end, 40 percent of children had a rule of 60 percent in a typical West German city.
The educational politician and member of the Bundestag Anja Weisgerber (CSU) can still get something from this idea. Many teachers said that “high immigration of recent years has led to overload, especially if there are no linguistic requirements,” she explained TAZ. Requires “Honest Debats about the stress of our education system.” This includes not only financing, but also “control and restriction of migration”.
The Federal Ministry of Education, on the other hand, later tried to limit the damage. According to the press secretary, Karin Prince called such a quota only “one of several models subject to thought.” So what exactly did you say, approved?
Grandan wants to look at Canada
Right at the beginning of the conversation World-The editor of the supplier in Denmark, where there is a limitation of people with migration experience in certain parts of the city, and asked if this could be a model for schools here. Ejen replied: “This is a possible model, there are also many other models that we know about.” It is extremely important that children can be German for school. This requires early tests and mandatory measures to support the language.
Burgard Hakte after Denmark asked how high the quota should be. It makes sense to “take a look at the experience of other countries, whether it is 30 or 40 percent at the end,” replied Preent that these models will make sense only if early language support is working. Prien emphasized that there are not only problems “with children with the history of migration, but also with children from families who have always been here.” It should be “done only in educational policy, which are promising,” said Prien. In Denmark, you know that “not yet.” She played for Canada for her eyes. They are “extremely successful in PISA and also have high immigration.”
What almost did not fall into the media: in Denmark there is no legally defined quota for children with migration experience in schools. Danish Social Democrats only believe that no more than 30 percent of children have migration experience in schools. Municipalities can decide for themselves how they cope with this – there are also hot debates about this.
(Cooperation: Ann Dihoff)
