Madrid socialism is mobilizing so that its secretary general does not lead the delegation to the Federal Congress in Seville after having attributed to him an operation to protect himself as leader against Ferraz and which ended up targeting La Moncloa in the case of the emails from the prosecutor’s office which the Supreme Court investigates the crimes confessed by Ayuso’s boyfriend
Madrid PSOE leaders condemn Lobato and ask him to resign before Friday
Welcome to Madrid socialism. The federation of unrest, internal crises, table tables, Cainite struggles, disgraces, betrayals, organic compromises… Everything except winning the elections since they lost the regional government in 1995 of the last century. The Last Fire has Juan Lobato as the protagonist. The Secretary General himself was called to testify before the Supreme Court, after the Abc newspaper published this Monday information in which Moncloa is attributed to the leak of a secret document from Ayuso’s boyfriend and “in which he tried to involve” the still leader of the Madrid socialists.
He always This is important because in the most turbulent federation of the PSOE, Ferraz’s intention to promote the replacement of Lobato as candidate for the Community of Madrid has been known for months and also that the favorite of the leadership, like the announced elDiario.es on November 16, it is Óscar López, Minister of Digital Transformation and Public Service. Don’t miss the information or the date because they are essential to unraveling Lobato’s alleged intentions.
And there may be a political motivation behind the decision to appear before a notary to attest to a WhatsApp conversation held on March 14 with Pilar Sánchez Acera, who was López’s chief of staff at the time and then director of the office of Pedro Sánchez, and who allegedly tried to convince him to use an e-mail sent by Ayuso’s lawyer to the Prosecutor’s Office during the regional government’s control session which was going to take place the same day.
That same morning, several media outlets published that Alberto González Amador’s defense had sent a letter to the public prosecutor’s office to acknowledge that he had committed two tax offenses and thus obtain a reduced sentence that would not force him to go to prison. . The email in question denied a hoax spread by Ayuso’s chief of staff, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, and published by various media without the slightest verification, according to which it was the prosecutor’s office that had proposed a deal to Ayuso’s partner and that, later, he would have withdrawn “by order from above”, in reference to the state attorney general. But no one talks about it anymore.
The saying goes that when the finger points to the sky, the fool looks at the finger. And the case of Ayuso’s boyfriend became, through the work and grace of the MAR factory, in the case of the FGE and, who knows, if in the case of Sánchez because that is the argument that the right already uses thanks to the astracanada Lobato de Juan going to a notary with messages from Sánchez Acera, who is also a member of his own regional management.
In the most turbulent socialist federation in Spain, it is assumed that Lobato went to the notary “thinking that in this way he would have the protection” of the federal government at the time when the primary procedure for the general secretary of Madrid was opening and that it ended up in a labyrinth in which it names La Moncloa in the investigation that the Supreme Court keeps open against the Attorney General of the State for the document that certifies the recognition of the crimes of Ayuso’s boyfriend and of the pact which he proposed to the public prosecutor.
Lobato’s version is that he wanted to record the messages exchanged after learning that the courts were investigating the leaked email; However, he went to the notary at the beginning of November, eight months after the controversy was publicized and a month after the Supreme Court indicted Álvaro García Ortiz. He adds: “I wanted to point out that neither I nor Pilar Sánchez Acera received any information from the prosecution, but that the media already had it. In times of hoaxes, it is useful to prove the reality of the facts.”
He does not, however, explain why he did not inform Sánchez Acera of his visit to the notary if his intention was to also exonerate López’s chief of staff, as well as himself, from any responsibility as to the origin email. He only did so last Sunday evening, when ABC reported that Lobato had refused to use the document during his usual face-to-face meeting with Ayuso, a statement that falls under its own weight. by browsing the video library of the Madrid Assembly of March 14, where we can clearly see how the leader of the PSOE-M brandishes the document in question.
Beyond the legal derivative and what it brings or not to the investigation opened by the Supreme Court, the actions of Lobato, which, according to several voices of Madrid socialism, would have been sponsored and monitored by his father, a story of Madrid socialism from the same who, it seems, also recommended to him the name of the notary to whom he should contact. In any case, Lobato has attracted the animosity of a large part of his federation, which lashed out on Monday against its general secretary and asked him not to attend the Federal Congress in Seville at the head of the Madrid delegation. It turns out that the current leader of the Madrid socialists will testify as a witness before the Supreme Court a few hours before traveling to the capital Seville to participate in the PSOE conclave.
Executives and activists do not believe in the disorder that Lobato himself has gotten himself into and are already warning that, if the party’s statutes had not been modified in 2017 after the Cainite Federal Committee of October 1, 2016 in which Sánchez found himself forced to resign, half plus one of the Regional Executive would have resigned from their functions this Monday to force the resignation of Lobato and the creation of a manager. Regardless, the primary process for electing the general secretary begins on December 7, so times wouldn’t have changed much either.
What is coming, if Lobato does not resign sooner, as some party officials call him a “traitor and disloyal”, will be a new fratricidal war in what was once called the Socialist Federation of Madrid. A group that, by the way, has experienced neither success, nor unity, nor organic peace since the time when the resignation of Alonso Puerta as general secretary was forced and he was replaced by Joaquín Leguina, who resolved the internal struggles with distribution. of power between the different families in what is called the table table. But that was so many years ago that there were still five years before Juan Lobato was born, who today has even more difficulty getting re-elected than yesterday. Nobody doubts it.
