From & nbspEuronews& nbspwith & nbspRes-Eia
Was published
Advertising
Discussion and decision on two sentences submitted by Pasok-Kinal and Siriza-P.S. And the new remaining ones to create a preliminary committee against two former ministers of the development of rural regions and food of Maki Voridis and Lefteris Avianakos.
The proposal of Paskok-Kinal, signed by the president of the opposition Nikos Andrulakis, 32 members of his parliamentary group, as well as two independent deputies calling to create a preliminary committee “for their possible committee in case of their abuse, in case of violations”, for former mortar and foods, in case of violations. Augenakis, while for Mr. Avenakis, he is also investigating the possibility of any “morality in infidelity, made and attempts” from 120 euros “illegal payments” from Opecepe.
The Second Proposal, Which Will Be Made in the Plenary Debate, Is the Signed by the President and Parliamentary Groups of Syriza-Ps and the New Lift, Calling for A Preliminary Committee Against the Former Minists of Rural Development and Foods Makis Voridis and Lefteris in a Criminal Infidelity Againste Interests of the European Union, Jointly and Repeatedly, with A Loss of More than 120,000 Euros (Art. 390 (1) and 2 in Art.
Political leaders are expected in plenary debate. The first round with the positions of the speakers of the parties will be opened with the position of the Siriz-Pod folder, since at first the new left proposal of Siris was presented, and it followed a few days later.
In the discussion that should be held, if they want, two former ministers who offer to send to the preliminary committee can be placed in a plenary supply.
After the discussion is completed, two proposals on one ballot will be placed in a secret vote with two proposed former ministers.
In order to create a preliminary committee of the House of Representatives, one of the two proposals must receive 151 positive voice, that is, the vast majority of the total number of members, otherwise the proposal deviates as clearly unreasonable. According to CSB, if the chamber decides not to create a preliminary committee, a new proposal for judicial persecution can be submitted on the same facts.