Given the successive disasters we have experienced after DANA, it is logical that some wish to distance themselves from politics and politicians. It is also logical that we wonder where these people come from, how they manage to occupy their positions or why these positions fluctuate and pass from one hand to another in a manner that is as random as it is inefficient. It is logical that this generates perplexity because there is not a cascade of resignations in Valencia, that the Popular Party cynically debates between burying or protecting Mazón and that Mazón is considering sacrificing part of his government to escape his own responsibilities. But, beyond all these current reflections and the more or less congenital problems of the political class, what there is no other choice than to rethink is the way in which co-governance works. in Spain.
The management of DANA, the mismanagement or absence of management, exposed the faults and deficiencies of an autonomous State which was the transactional fruit of a historical moment which has now passed. The abnormal scenario to which it has led, strangely located between decentralization and recentralization (declaration of emergency of national interest or state of alarm), indicates, among other things, that the administrative architecture of the State does not present the required characteristics by addressing. some problems. Either the central State is strengthened, or federalism is intensified by redefining the relationship between the different political entities. And I fear we are not settled in one place or another.
