According to Grandfather, the Constitutional Court overcame its powers, establishing new norms, and not just testing or feedback from the provision of the law.
“The Constitutional Court evaluates, cancels or, possibly, makes corrections, but does not create new norms,” he said.
He examined that this polemic should be immediately considered. One of the proposed decisions adopted a new law on the temporary appointment of DPRD. “Can other options create new laws. So they are not revised, but we can place it, ”he said.
Grandfather Yusuf warned that if the decision of the Constitutional Court was made without a revision of the rules, then the term of powers of the DPRD could be empty for up to 3.5 years.
“The main thing is that if Pilkada and DPRD, 2 years after the inauguration, then we can calculate that the DPR Ri is located in February, the inauguration of October, then DPR
“Therefore, there should be an idea whether there is a regulation for a temporary DPRD device, it should draw up a new law or, possibly, a new law that is not adopted by law. There are many options, we must wait for the leadership of the leadership, both DPR leaders and the leaders of the parties, ”he added.