The pelvis has already reported in May that the police representation cannot be correct. Now the study of the insurmountable association Surensis, NDR and Süddeutscher zeitung Published, this suspicion was restored. Until now, the study has been based on unpublished videos that show the scenes in question from the point of view of the bird’s eye and almost completed. NDR and Sz We checked the unprocessed pictures of a video found on forensics.
Once again, in the records, a later injured policeman with a service number BE24111 can be seen when he goes into the crowd with a colleague: inside with violence to arrest the demonstrator. When the policeman eliminates the arrested on the ground, the second policeman pushed another demonstrator on this policeman.
Soon after, he stands again and falls into the head of protest. When the policeman emerged from the crowd, the policeman in question suddenly holds his hand, with whom he had just hit. Then he sags together. The target attack on the police cannot be noticed at any time.
Freedom of the meeting should be limited
The press secretary of the police told TAZ that the new records were known to the police. To what extent the policeman, who was previously shot on the demonstrator: inside, did not want to say that the press secretary did not want to speak. The investigation of the prosecutor’s office of Berlin will be “in all directions.”
The press spokesman Sebastian Bukhner from the Prosecutor General also knows new records. “We have an open investigation that does not apply to confirmation of the police transfer,” he said TAZ. “If suspicions arise against the police, we will pursue this.” Nevertheless, the initial demonstrator initially began against unknown proceedings from a particularly severe case of violation of the world and dangerous bodily harm, has not yet stopped.
Meanwhile, the debate about the restriction of freedom of the meeting continues in Berlin. The Black and Red Coalition plans a strong expansion of police powers. In addition, SPD and CDU want to revise the concept of “public order” in the Assembly Law. Critics: They fear that a legally vague term can be prohibited not only or limited meetings that pose a specific danger to public security, but also those that cannot be seen on social networks – for example, paleolidarous protests.
