There is a consensus in a social dialogue regarding the addition of a pension by a gender gap after the sentences of the Court of the European Union and the Supreme Court, in which it is believed that the benefit is discriminatory in relation to men. In particular, both the employer and trade unions They agree that it is necessary to reformulate the spelling of Article 60, which regulates this plus and “expects” that the Ministry of Social Security offers modification.
Having learned the verdict, the two main unions in our country (UGT and CCOO) made a joint statement, calling for the leader Urgently get to the decisionThe modification field, for which representatives of employees give priority to others in a social dialogue, as explained by the sources of trade unions, They are afraid that this will become a “addition to paternity.”
Although in the judgment that in the case of a request of a man and a woman, they will additionally be provided with the lowest pension, they believe that the fact that men are medium – before access to retirement will damage women, because they can request this addition earlier, which will mean that a woman cannot collect benefits when she retires.
Sources close to the employer confirm the logic of this problem. Nevertheless, they remember that if the case under consideration is considered, and the woman accused a minor pension, this can apply, and then perceive a plus. At the moment, these sources indicate that the Ministry “evaluates” the impact and possible decisions. The last time the legislative changes took a year to arrive.
In 2021, the government approved the gender gap to replace pregnant women, which recognized only the right to women with two or more children. This change has already responded to the decision on how the men made the court of 2019, providing a “less favorable” handling with men. Now the addition that led to this proposal also gives problems, demanding people who meet a number of requirements; Providing women who had children automatically. In particular, the norm requires that men correspond to a series of conditions, such as stopping their career for children if they were born before 1995; Or, if they did it later, then the price of the next two years was 15% lower than in the previous two years.
In addition, in this environment, TS determined that social security should provide men with an addition to a pension for children to care in the same conditions as women.
According to the Ministry of 1 042 384, pensions in June included an addition to a decrease in gender gap, of which 88.4% correspond to women. The average amount was 75.3 euros per month.
