Home Latest News Federal budget for 2025: social policy remains a blind point

Federal budget for 2025: social policy remains a blind point

16
0

Inch He is unrealistic numbers forcing you to pay attention. Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) also announced the “comprehensive” reform of civilian benefits in budget debate. Several billion euros should be saved, 1.5 billion euros next year, as they said earlier.

Nevertheless, billions of billions will not save if the newly arrived Ukrainian refugees receive less social benefits. Even if the centers of work are more often inside and more often reduce performance if the purpose is missed. The discussion of money of citizenship is the delayed debate that the federal government is happy when it will feed, also because almost half of the recipients of benefits: there are no German citizenship, that is, there are no votes.

The main attention to the benefits of citizens is distracting from the fact that the delicate problems of social policy remain aside in the consulting commissions, that is, in the future. The medium -term future retirement, regarding the growing share of the elderly, who will also subsequently belong to young people today, will also be dubious. It is not clear to manage the deficit in medical insurance companies. There is a huge hole in guardianship.

The fear of voters is due to the fact that black and red government is unlikely to talk about problems and possible solutions here. Because in the middle environment of the middle class there are also unpleasant debates about distribution. How much can you increase contributions for medical insurance and contributions to long -term insurance?

Are there any additional contributions to the medical insurance company or mandatory additional insurance in nursing, which should be paid by citizens: only inside? What else is true for your own shares, at least with the rich? Is it not advisable to support state budgets with higher assets or inheritance taxes, which, in turn, can stabilize pension and medical insurance companies?

If the issue of distribution is not discussed, the problems are prepared, as in the case of savings in the 1990s and in the so -called zero years. An increase in pressure, debt presses, rupture in holes at home, weakening the economy does not want to pay any higher contributions to social security for its employees – and suddenly events are no longer a problem that was previously unthinkable.

Then for everyone there is an increase in the retirement age, regardless of how tired the work is. Medical insurance contributions only increase for employees: inside. The lowest level of care can be canceled. Wealthy provides a private hired additional care. The level of pension is immersed, whoever and can perform work at the age of 70 years. And then it almost does not matter which side puts the federal chancellor.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here