ABC. Title: “Otegi muzzles Sánchez and shows his influence in the government by forcing him to cross more red lines”; Editorial: “Bildu reviews the police. The fact that Bildu is the one who prescribes the functioning of the police forces constitutes a direct insult to the victims of ETA and to the citizens of Spanish democracy”; Ignacio Camacho: “It will be a year of your support [Bildu] at the nomination and the price is not yet known, although it is suspected. To find out, we must scrutinize, almost always with a delay, the prison movements (…) Like, just yesterday, the third degree of the hitmen who killed Fernando Buesa and his bodyguard and Martín Carpena, Muñoz Cariñanos and Luis Portero (…) They have now obtained legislative influence to restrict police street operations”; Carlos Herrera: “The police can use rubber bands with which little children play their little fights, never rubber bullets (…) and they will not be able to identify street criminals unless they use the methods of Versailles in the middle of battle (…) We experienced this same week the culmination of the hidden letter of the pact: transferring the prisoners to the Basque Country, transferring the management of the prison and, consequently, granting camouflaged freedoms to the murderers who did not showed no form of repentance (…). As if this ridicule were not enough, Sánchez, in his unspeakable misery, cedes to his “progressive” partners the right (…) to reform the rules by which the security of all citizens is ensured by the children of Otegui. ”
The world. Editorial: “Among the most politically and morally serious transfers that the government has granted to Bildu, the one made yesterday stands out for its dark symbolic charge. After (…) the granting of semi-liberties to unrepentant ETA prisoners (…) granting the proud heir of the terrorist organization an incontestable political victory: the ability to rewrite (…) that known as the Gag law .” The reason. Francisco Marhuenda: “I am disgusted by what Sánchez, his government and the PSOE are doing, giving in to Bildu with the citizen security law or the release of the gang’s assassins who have neither collaborated with justice nor repented (. ..) This is total contempt for the victims and society. Right now, Sánchez is behaving as if Spain were a satrapy where he can do what he wants as if we were his vassals and we had to accept his whims and arbitrariness. “His submission to the heirs of ETA was, is and always will be an indignity.” Digital freedom. Cristina Losada: “From lead to rubber. The signature of Bildu, with the honors of the protagonist, in a standard that affects the work of security forces and organizations borders on grotesque and sadism. The objective. Editorial: “The ignominy with Bildu. “Sánchez gives Bildu the keys to police behavior.”
Another small group. Okdiario. Editorial. “Sánchez instructs the wolf Bildu to take care of the sheep. What Pedro Sánchez did by accepting the proposals of the pro-ETA members of Bildu for his ongoing reform of the Citizen Security Law is one of those indecency that is repugnant not only because of the objective it pursues – the support of the political heirs of ETA – but because the successors of a band of assassins are given command on the spot when they determine and govern the behavior of the forces and state security organs. The debate. Editorial: “Sánchez goes to Bildu. Those who doubted the existence of secret pacts between the PSOE and Bildu (…) will have definitively lost them when they see the latest misdeed which demonstrates it: accepting that Arnaldo Otegi dictates the reform of the law on citizen security for the ‘adapt to his whims’; Luis Ventoso: “The party of assassins is a partner of the Spanish government, a coalition of socialists and communists. The murderers are taking to the streets en masse, due to a dark agreement between the PSOE and the ETA party (…) Félix, Pedro, with what face of stainless steel and with what soul of ice do you ignore the pain of the victims, including the relatives of the murdered socialists And we end the block with Mayte Alcaraz, that? everything is permitted, like tuna or sparrow: “In response to the political orders emanating from the president of the government, they attack the judges themselves, the courageous prosecutors and those who spoil the orgy of power for the Guide supreme Whether it is the partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, on whom secret data is revealed; if it is the work of judge Peinado, whose decisions against Begoña Gómez are torpedoed by the prosecution; or the victims of ETA whose slaughterers obtain the third degree with the agreement of the Court prosecutor, who does not lift a finger.”
It is convenient to know where our faithful and courageous infantry stands in the massacre of the Middle East. Even if you already imagine it.
ABC. Salvador Sostres: “It seems incredibly despicable to me that the free West, moored in the bay of tranquility, does not realize, much less assume, that every dead Islamist is one of our daughters who can save our lives » ; OKdiario. Vicente Gil: “Israel is improving the world by liquidating the rat Nasrallah of Hezbollah in Lebanon (…) The same end awaits sooner or later the rat who succeeded him, his cousin Hashem Safi al-Din.” In The debate, They are clear. Editorial: “With Israel, without cracks and with head. The Hebrew State is the Western embassy in hell and must feel accompanied and conditioned by the support of all”; Ramón Pérez-Maura. First: “Containment of Israel is not the solution. “Iran is moving closer to developing nuclear weapons every day, and at this time it is fully justified that the response to last Tuesday’s Iranian attack targets the plants that are developing Iran’s nuclear program”; and second: “Israel did what it had to do: put an end to a criminal who was on par with bin Laden. And the highborn should be grateful. You and I, dear reader, were as much a target of Hassan Nasrallah as the thousands of people murdered by Hezbollah over the years”; Luis Ventoso: “Yolanda and Urtasun, Möet communists who consider themselves podium stars, condemn Israel as much as they can and never their adversaries. They are practically supporting Iran, which is using Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis for a war that the Iranians are waging by proxy, what the Anglo-Saxons call a proxy war.” Vozpopuli. José María Múgica: “The sooner the West understands that Israel is our trench of freedom in the face of barbarism in this region, that if a disaster occurs, the next to fall would be ourselves, we would undoubtedly have moved forward, and a lot (…) You see, but to receive congratulations from terrorists like Hamas or the Houthis is to be on the wrong side of history. This is if the government, an expert in the art of provoking international conflicts, is content with such shame.”
Today we want to end with a tribute to culture. A memory of arts and letters.
The world. Arcadi Espada never disappoints: “The film ‘My name is Nevenka’ is a defamatory libel, an aggressive pamphlet, the intention of which has nothing to do with the truth, but with propaganda (…) it is nothing other than a collection of stickers which follows the swollen journey of the book by Juan José Millás, There is something that is not as I am told, which is reissued with a dog’s nose every six months. (Catavenenos recommends, only for strong stomachs, to read the entire article. In the journal archives of The world).
Further away. ABC. Pedro Cuartango: “The double face of Almodóvar. His opinions border on banality when they do not offend intelligence. “The king is naked, but almost no one dares to tell him that.” The reason. Pedro Narváez: “The last battle took place last weekend in San Sebastian. It seemed that in the discursive trance Almodóvar was going to win, whose films what happens to the gypsy beauties of the Rastro, that you look at them so pretty and when your eyes fall on the floor you see the slippers with their wedges . Something like this happens to Pedro, the first Pedro in this story, his later films seem to be, but that’s not the case. He himself should understand that so many rewards and tributes forgive him for his stupidity”; In Digital freedom, Santiago Navajas: “Pedro Sánchez, Almodóvar, Bardem and other guys from the stock market. Even the king of lies needs jesters to lie to him. Where there are posturing in Almodovar, in Bardem there is fanaticism.” return to ABC. José F. Peláez: “Nacho Cano is one of the great geniuses that Spain has given (…) If it were England, he would be Mister, like McCartney. But in this Iberian misfortune, we are more Sor than Monsieur, and the nuns of the regime cannot stand the success of those who do not pray the progressive rosary every morning. Here, those who triumph “against” are systematically despised. And even more so if this triumph is located in the space of the arts, territory conquered by the alpha males of Sanchism to mark it as theirs”; Agustín Pery: “Broncano, money and sex. We’re celebrating a presenter who doesn’t vocalize, doesn’t prepare for interviews, and whose biggest interests are masturbation and money.”
Last point. In The debate, Luis Ventoso: “Mafalda? No, we are fans of Manolito. Now that Quino’s strips are 60 years old, we can take stock: the merchant’s son was right and the scandalous daughter was wrong.”
Wow, they don’t like Mafalda either. To grow, a dangerous red. Of course. And also feminist.
