Home Latest News Hamburg Reperbahn: Participation of citizens entered the garbage bucket

Hamburg Reperbahn: Participation of citizens entered the garbage bucket

17
0

Hamburg pelvis | The wall of raising at a height-drawn without replacement, the city balcony was canceled without replacement, subcultures and postino clusters, canceled without replacement: one of the most interesting projects for urban development and citizens’ participation in the Republic threatens to fail in Hamburg-Riberban.

Since the Senate of Hamburg has now confirmed the parliamentary group in citizens, most of the ideas are not realized from the complex process of participation in the new construction area of ​​the Palmavert. The charm of the project falls on the side of the road. “The new project will be stupid, cruel and expensive,” – decided that the planned information that organized the participation process.

The subject of the dispute is a large plot of land on Reperbahn, on which, until eleven years ago, buildings with a high level of genus with cheap, but dilapidated rental apartments were. The initiative of citizens tried to preserve the “ESSO House”, named after the neighboring gas station. District activists organized protests, at the end of which Mitte district finally opened the plan.

The model was a neighboring park on the edge of the harbor

The model was a project at the other end of Saint -Pauli, where the area was developed on the edge of the harbor in accordance with the ideas of the inhabitants. The “collective desired production” was created as an artistic project, which Christophe Shefer presented the initiator in document 11 in Kassel in 2002.

The result of the plan was a small, strongly mixed area that was supposed to accept the structure of the code of St. Pauli-Pauli, as the Shefer called. We are talking about small large -scale structures, the confused public and more or less private premises, numbers for small enterprises and clubs, for neighboring meetings and sports, as well as places for the hotel – in the end, you planned for Reeperbahn.

The pressure of the public and the result of this procedure for participation were also convinced by the investor by Bayerish Khausbau. City competition after citizens’ participation ended in 2015 with a unanimous result. “A small general concept that offers allocation options,” Eso praised the initiative. And the investor of the Bavarian House Construction saw his “requirements for the economy of new buildings.”

Nevertheless, the latter, however, has changed with exploding construction prices and an increase in financing costs, not least in connection with Corona pandemia. The Bavarian House Building dragged the project before the end of last year, and the active training of the Senate, the municipal housing company Saga and the private investor bought a district and collected a list of wishes.

The Paloma area could become one of the places for everyone who is now, there are interchangeable buildings without reference to the area

The conclusion of the left

Your plan provides only social housing, but the hotel is twice as much. According to the list of the left Senate, there should be two rooms for music clubs, but there are no rooms for the subculture. The proposed hostel is deleted; 213 square meters are still planned for the AUS User District. The planned and small scale, which should breathe in the vicinity of life, falls on the sidelines.

“The great task for the Palom region is to be able to generally implement planning within the framework of altered market conditions,” the city development management, headed by the NPP, justifies. Only after long negotiations and the use of state funds to turn the Paloma area into a stable project.

Code of St. Pauli entered the garbage bucket

A project with exclusively funded apartments, with common zones and a full building can only be provided for the creative industry in the city center – this is also exclusively for Hamburg. “After many years of standing, finally, a viable solution was discovered, which benefits the greater population,” writes authority.

“It should not be so that the Senate is simply entering the garbage bucket in the professional interests of the investor quantum,” criticizes Marco Hosemann from the left faction. It will also damage trust in politics and administration and contradicts everything that SPD and herbs wrote about the participation of citizens in their coalition agreement. The city development department did not comment on this charge.

The conclusion of the left: “The Paloma area could become one of the places for everyone who is now independent of buildings will come without a link to the district and use it for the region, since they build saga and investors in other places.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here