He may think that he ended in a wonderful round trip between California and the United Kingdom, but fate and justice decided differently. Prince Harry will still have to face the British courts. This time, this is an explosive issue of its security that is in the middle of the file.
Remember: Last January, Harry has to go to London In a legal battle facing the mirror group. But the financial agreement of 10 million pounds with Rupert Murdok finally avoided it in a court box. Except this time, there is no correct passage. The Duke of Sussex must be in London’s Supreme Court on April 8 and 9For the case that affects the ultra -sensitive point: its personal protection on British soil.
February 2020 and the official withdrawal of Harry and Megan from their royal functions (known “Megxit”), Executive Committee of Royalty and Personal Protection – Aliya Rawk – decided No longer grant them security supported by the state. A real subject of disagreement for a couple who thinks that these privileges threaten them. And for good reason, in the absence of government protection, Sussex must be involved in a private company to ensure their safety on the channel. A solution that no longer fits them: “Thus, two considerations will compete with the Supreme Court on Tuesday and WednesdayDuring the audience it is partially open to the public in accordance with the decision of the judges “GB News reports.
A new blow to Prince Harry
And this return of justice does not really fall for the best time. Because of the image, Prince Harry crosses a real storm. Last week, as a result of criticism, he officially left his role as a sponsor of the Sentball Association – an organization he deserved in 2006 to help children with HIV affected by HIV. To the question? Serious accusations made by Zimbabwe’s lawyer and former president of the Association against the prince. A situation that stops slightly more than its already weakened image. Suffice it to say that its return to London, between the court tensions and the family, the risks as never … never … with or without a close guard.
