Involved by the metro police to clarify the case of a diploma of Jokovi, Roy Surio K.S. does not want to come (photo: oxon)
JAKARTA – Ahmad Khozinudin, a Roy lawyer Surio CS, said that his client received an invitation to clarify Jakarta from the metropolitan police against a report published by the 7th President of the Republic of Indonesia, Joko Vidodo in the Diploma Jookov case. However, he emphasized that he would not fulfill the invitation.
“We do not attend an invitation to clarify, as we explained the basis of the argument. We want to apply the law, so the whole process and procedure must also obey the law, ”he said in Matraman, Eastern Jakarta, on Tuesday (1/7/2025).
According to him, the invitation to clarifications was sent by the police by Jakarta Roy Surio CS in 10 reports about the volunteers of Jokovi, whose affairs were transferred to the metropolitan police of Jakarta. The explanation schedule was held on Wednesday, July 2, 2025. However, his party reluctantly fulfilled him.
“If the past is really subjective, we are interested in clarifying the report of Brother Joko Vidodo, but if it does not matter, people who report our clients have no legal situation,” he said.
According to him, reporters are not part of the Jokovi family. “He is not a family of Jokovi, and not in the genealogy of the Jokovi family. For example, son -in -law, great -grandfather, great -grandson. Exactly that, in our opinion, it is not necessary to clarify, because there is no business with us with these people, ”said Ahmad.
He explained that the invitation to explain to the report of the Jokowi volunteers was more chaotic than an invitation to explanation to the report published by Jokowi First, which was mentioned in the article, Locus and Tempus. Nevertheless, an invitation of explanations this time was not mentioned what events, where and when.
In addition, he explained that in the Criminal Procedure Code there was not a single norm of the article regulating the mechanism of investigation of the criminal case, issuing an invitation of clarification. There are only provisions regarding call 1, call 2, to forced efforts, when 2 calls published earlier will not be made for no apparent reason.
