On the night of the opening of the fifty -ninth session of the Karlovo Varya festival in the Czech Republic, two days ago, the “presidential award” was awarded to actors Vika Crebis and Peter Sargard, amid the applause of the participants. However, although the actress Luxurgian spoke about her feelings about this celebration, the American actor decided to talk about politics, calling for a movie that illuminates the minds and opens what is happening all over the world in support of rapprochement and peace.
Great words. The festival did not provide his text on his official platform, after the actor mentioned his observations on American foreign policy, which, according to him, “became a witness to his withdrawal from his global duties.”
The actor (recently we saw in September 5) called for a collective international act to ensure a suitable environment for peace around the world, noting: “My country is divided into political, high -quality and racist role.” He added that Jews are divided around the war in turn.
Positions and platforms
The actor’s speech is a general diplomatic invitation that wants to include her words in order to call for a new meeting between the parties to international conflicts, in which each of them is fully responsible for the spread of peace and love, and completed his statement, borrowing the phrase mentioned by the former president of the Czech Republic, the atalaf -gaoophile, which is looking for consent where they are, is in the fact that he is warming up, which is warming up, which is warming up, which is warm Half can not warm up something else.
Scarsgard joins a number of actors and directors who, for years, who have not been standing on the platform for not far for years, accept an honor or prize in order to speak out as constructive political opinions. British director. Be a bow, talked about the need for Europe in solving problems with poverty and health and social insurance problems, every time he stood on Berlin, Pauta and the Cannes festival. The latter, having won the golden chastity for one of his most important films “I, Danel Blake, went to the platform and made the 10th minute we are talking about the message of the film to his spectators.
Last year, when the interested zone won the Berlin Prize for 2023, and then in Oscars the same year, director Jonathan Glazer stood up and announced his hostile position what Israel does in gas. Last year, the Israeli director Joval Abraham from the Oscar’s platform, when he and the Palestinian Hamdan Bilal (and the other two) won the best documentary Oscar, with Israeli practices against the Palestinians for many years before the current war in gas. While the “zone of interest” has removed limited proposals in the United States, after strong efforts, “no other land” is continued to be limited by two small shows in New York and Los -Angeles.
French criticism – Palestinian
This year, the president of the jury at the Cannes festival Juliet Pinosh criticized in her first official performance on the War of the Gas, calling for the fair world and the suspension of military operations.
All this indicates the transformation of annual festivals and cinematic events into the possibility of launching political positions, most of which need a fair world, criticism of the Israeli government and its attacks on a safe.
Palestinian directors, Arabs and Tarzan Nazer won “Cannes” also with a reward for the best director in the “Watch” competition for their films “Once upon a time”, and they did not give their criticism what was happening in the Palestinian territories when he took the platform to present the film.
As if festivals that usually prefer not only to turn into political disputes are the only ones that allow not only political sermons, but also win films against the official political line of Western countries, in particular. As for the show of the film in American cities, it was only at festivals.
Siege
This is noted is that most films that win prizes at international festivals that say that around us, in Palestine and others, do not gain popularity that they deserve in the American show. This is if she has the opportunity to find companies who want to spread.
It was as if it was a matter of those who want to reveal what he thinks about in global cases, especially in the European, but when it comes to the presentation of the same films in the United States, the issue is different. The film is unlikely to find a distributor, daring to sign a distribution contract with working producers. Often the doors will not find “no other land”, knowing that this is Israeli production.
Important festivals show. There is an audience for her, but commercial offers are the most important because they represent public opinion, and not to use commercial offers – this is a kind of imposed siege that raises its position to its size and prevents the expression of its point of view.
What is happening is that large studios do not buy the rights of these films at all, since they belong, mainly for politics in support of the Israeli side, and small companies cannot guarantee a boom and prefer not to lower their feet in hot topics, creating a material loss or confrontation of a political lobby. Thus, you prefer to play this safety.
No “yes”
This type of transaction on films does not cease to express what is happening in gas or in some other Palestinian position, but rather exceeds any film that does not convey what expresses the official Israeli point of view. In fact, “not a single land” is an Israeli film, but it contradicts its policy, as refers to the Israeli film shown at the Cannes Festival, in the section “half of the month of directors” called “Yes” (yes), the description of the ruling team and its surrounding environment as a control of emotions and opinions that can only agree in the majority).
When his director Nadaf Lapid and the Producing Company (AMP) tried to access him to the American market after his opening at CAN, where the Carlovy Vary festival will be presented this week, he discovered the same shade that the “Zone of interest” and “No other land” earlier. It is strange, 3 North American festival, the “New York Film Festival”, Telerado and Toronto, rejected their show.
Currently, Palestinian Producer RachId MashRaWI Faces Difficulty in Finding An American Hall to Show Movie “From The Distance Distance”, Knowing the Film Consisting of 22 Short Films for 20 Directors, Does Not Recite a Political Position and Doges Not Criticize an israeli Discourse, Which He Claimed to a Number of Critics in America and EUROPE, BUT Rather Intentionally Filming the Pension Sitation in Gaza Before the End of Last Year, Wen The Conditions Were Still Relatively acceptable.
Freedom of expression, but …
It is noteworthy that American films criticizing American or foreign policy do not face the same situation.
Another film that criticizes the United States, far from the Palestinian -Israeli problem, is allowed, especially if it is American production. Many American films revolve around their presidents in criticism, and more than they focused on the problem of corruption between people, up to the “CIA” and “FBI” and any other corner in the government pyramid. There is no full census of films that were shown or racist discrimination in the United States. In addition to films that opened their eyes to environmental risks or warned from their disasters, and took the position of condemnation in the shortening of officials on them.
But this is not among these films, unless it is shown in cinemas, television stations or on various home platforms.
This is not surprising that the actors and directors in their majority are absent, expressing the opinion of this conflict in Palestine. If they support the point of view of Israel, public opinion will be attacked, and if they abandon it and show a position in support of Gaza’s victims, the institutes rebelled against them.
In fact, in both cases, production companies play the first round in this film, close to comedy; She does not encourage the expression on the invasion of the Gazanians, fearing that the actor loses the size of his glory, and, therefore, the income of his next film, but she, of course, does not want the filmmakers to enter the same topic from the point of view that contradicts what is happening. They, like Mark Ryvallo, the central dodger, the director Mike Lee and dozens of others, could sign the tests in the show of the show, but for this there is no unimaginable effect, as if one of them acted as a solo and sharp position, like actress Suzan Sarandon, who led to the lack of a desire to cooperate with her, as I ended up in London, “daily”.
