Judge Inmaculada Iglesias summoned Alberto González Amador to testify as investigation on November 29 for the alleged commission of two crimes of tax fraud and a crime of lying in a commercial document relating to a alleged tax fraud attributed to him by the Madrid public prosecutor’s office, were confirmed to judicial sources.
In a summons order, the titular magistrate of the Court of Instruction number 19 of Madrid summons the suspects to appear on the same day. four others are under investigation as part of the same legal proceedings.
The appearances were scheduled for June 24 but were postponed at the request of the popular prosecution which represents the PSOE and Más Madrid after requesting in a letter that Five new alleged crimes to be investigated following the analysis of a report from the tax administration appearing in the procedure.
A few days ago, the judge agreed to open a separate room to investigate whether the couple Isabel Diaz Ayuso allegedly committed crimes other than those already investigated in the main case.
The separate article opens with the investigation into possible new crimes “in the use of the instrumental or front company to Masterman SL through the partial transfer of a service contract signed between Maxwell Cremona SL – the company of Alberto González Amador – and his client Quirón Prevention SL”.
Tax offenses
The investigation into a alleged tax fraud focuses on the alleged criminal evidence regarding facts related to corporate tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 and an alleged crime of falsification of a commercial document due to invoices provided that do not correspond to the services actually provided and provided with the aim of reducing the amount of tax payable.
In the order opening the procedure, the judge considered that allegedly and “due to these fraudulent behaviors, the taxpayer stopped paying to the State Treasury a tax of 155,000 euros for tax on companies of 2020 and for companies of 2021, a tax of 195,951 euros”.
He argued that these behaviors are classified with “offenses punishable by article 305.1 of the Penal Code in medial competition with an offense of counterfeiting of a commercial document, of article 392.1 in relation to article 390 of the Penal Code”.
The Prosecutor’s Office investigated the events following a Tax administration report which warned of alleged tax fraud when “fictitious expenses based on invoices issued by various companies” were detected during an investigation.
“Expenses that do not correspond to the services actually provided and all this with the aim of entering into the public treasury less than the amount that corresponded to the payment of corporate tax for the financial years 2020 and 2021,” the complaint states of the prosecutor.
On January 22, the prosecutor’s office received a report from the tax authorities regarding the entity Maxwell Cremona Engineering and Processes Society for the Promotion of the Environment from which are deduced “certain data and indications on facts linked to Corporate Tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 which could constitute an offense”
The report spoke of two crimes against the Public Treasury resulting in “tax fraud calculated by the Treasury Inspectorate in an amount greater than 120,000 euros and an alleged offense of forgery in a commercial document because the invoices provided do not correspond to the services actually provided and provided with the aim of reducing the royalty.” tax to satisfy”.
Opening of an investigation procedure
Following this report, the public prosecutor’s office agreed on January 23 to open an investigative procedure, which led to the filing of the complaint before the investigating courts of Madrid.
According to the prosecutor, the management of the company during the verified period was carried out by a single administrator Alberto GA, associate of the regional president. Verification actions were initiated by the Tax Agency on May 12, 2022.
During said corporate tax audit actions for the years 2020 and 2021 of the aforementioned company, according to the complaint, “it was detected that said company, with the aim of evading its tax, due to the increase in corporate tax. volume of business that he had experienced during these years, he adopted certain behaviors, with the sole aim of reducing said taxation”.
