Home Top Stories Judge suspends Ayuso’s boyfriend’s statement in tax fraud case for third time

Judge suspends Ayuso’s boyfriend’s statement in tax fraud case for third time

18
0
Judge suspends Ayuso’s boyfriend’s statement in tax fraud case for third time

The judge Immaculate Churches, who is investigating Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of Madrid President Isabel Díaz Ayuso, for alleged tax fraud, suspended for the third time the businessman’s statement, scheduled for November 29, at the request of his defense.

Legal sources confirm to EFE that the president of the Court of Instruction number 19 of Madrid responded to the request of the businessman’s lawyers and agreed to cancel his statement and that of the four other defendants, as the newspaper put it The world.

González Amador’s defense requested that his statement be suspended until the Madrid Provincial Court resolves the appeal he presented against the extension of the trial aimed at investigating his commercial relations with the company. Prevention Chiron.

Alberto González Amador is under investigation, for the alleged commission of two crimes of tax fraud and a crime of lying in a commercial document relating to a alleged tax fraud attributed to him by the Madrid public prosecutor’s office, were confirmed to judicial sources.

This is the third time that the businessman’s statement has been postponed. The investigation into a alleged tax fraud focuses on the alleged criminal evidence regarding facts related to corporate tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 and an alleged crime of falsification of a commercial document due to invoices provided that do not correspond to the services actually provided and provided with the aim of reducing the amount of tax payable.

In the order opening the procedure, the judge considered that allegedly and “due to these fraudulent behaviors, the taxpayer stopped paying to the State Treasury a tax of 155,000 euros for tax on companies of 2020 and for companies of 2021, a tax of 195,951 euros”.

He argued that these behaviors are classified with “offenses punishable by article 305.1 of the Penal Code in medial bankruptcy, with the offense of forgery in a commercial document, of article 392.1 in relation to article 390 of the Penal Code”.

The Prosecutor’s Office investigated the events following a Tax administration report which warned of alleged tax fraud when “fictitious expenses based on invoices issued by various companies” were detected during an investigation.

“Expenses that do not correspond to the services actually provided and all this with the aim of entering into the public treasury less than the amount that corresponded to the payment of corporate tax for the financial years 2020 and 2021,” the complaint states of the prosecutor.

On January 22, the prosecutor’s office received a report from the tax authorities regarding the entity Maxwell Cremona Engineering and Processes Society for the Promotion of the Environment from which are deduced “certain data and indications on facts linked to Corporate Tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 which could constitute an offense”

The report spoke of two crimes against the Public Treasury resulting in “tax fraud calculated by the Treasury Inspectorate in an amount greater than 120,000 euros and an alleged offense of forgery in a commercial document because the invoices provided do not correspond to the services actually provided and provided with the aim of reducing the royalty.” tax to satisfy”.

Opening of an investigation procedure

Following this report, the public prosecutor’s office agreed on January 23 to open an investigative procedure, which led to the filing of the complaint before the investigating courts of Madrid.

According to the prosecutor, the management of the company during the verified period was carried out by a single administrator Alberto GA, associate of the regional president. Verification actions were initiated by the Tax Agency on May 12, 2022.

During said corporate tax audit actions for the years 2020 and 2021 of the aforementioned company, according to the complaint, “it was detected that said company, with the aim of evading its tax, due to the increase in corporate tax. volume of business that he had experienced during these years, he adopted certain behaviors, with the sole aim of reducing said taxation”.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here