Lebanon is preparing to answer the American newspaper, asking about “guarantees”

Russian government media reported that Israeli leaks about the secret contacts that took place between Moscow and Tel Aviv in recent days, focusing on the relationship with Syria and Iran. Since the Russian official level avoids commenting on the data, but the resolution of the news transmitted, which were attributed to the official Israeli broadcasting corporation, attach to it additional importance.

The TAS government news agency stated that the conversation about “diplomatic contacts at a high level”, which began after the end of the Israeli military campaign against Tehran. He added that the official Israeli broadcasting corporation “was“ confirmed ”that“ Israel and Russia are in secret contacts on conflict resolution in relations with Hebrew with Iran and Syria. ”

As Kan pointed out, the dialogue began after “about a week” from the end of the Israeli war and in the light of Moscow’s links for his readiness for “mediation” between the two sides. The Office of Radio and Television, in particular, confirmed that “Moscow was not armed with Tehran” and did not provide concrete support to the Iranians during a 12 -day conflict. In addition, the Israeli side maintained contacts with Russia, “regarding the efforts made to achieve a political decision” in Syria.

At the same time, Tel -Aviv, according to the media institute, was looking for diplomatic guarantees for Iran in his dialogue with the United States. It is expected that this problem will become one of the tops between the prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump during their meeting in Washington, scheduled for the next week.

Since Moscow avoided commenting on the data at the official level, the diplomatic source in Moscow was informed by ASHARQ Al -AWSAT that the Israeli report “Unjustified”. He explained that “the position of Moscow is clear and published in relation to Iran and Syria, and in its worst cases, relations with Tel Aviv, especially against the backdrop of a strong Russian condemnation of Israeli’s actions, whether it is against the Palestinian people or an attack on Iran and Syria.

At the same time, the source indicated that the diplomatic channels between the two parties “are a“ list through which Moscow worked to condemn the behavior of Israel, which violates the resolutions of the United Nations, especially with regard to the respect of the sovereignty of the two countries and not attack them. “The source said that the Russian position adheres to the right of the Palestinian people to create an independent state on the lands of 1967, and its capital of Eastern Jerusalem has repeatedly grown the anger of Israel.

Nevertheless, it seemed that the communication channels between Moscow and Tel Aviv worked actively and for several months and were not limited to communications that could occur after the war between Israel and Iran. Although this war says that experts in Moscow may have opened a new opportunity to improve the Russian role for mediation or to benefit from its consequences at the regional level or in relation to the situation in Syria, in particular.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, immediately after the war, expressed a flash of war during a conversation with the prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu about Moscow’s readiness to make efforts to meditate in the Israeli conflict. On the same day, the Kremlin announced a conversation between Putin and President of Iran Masud Bachashayan, after which it was announced that Russia would continue its close contact with Iran and Israel in order to avoid the terrible consequences of their conflict throughout the Middle East.

Speaking during the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 20, Putin emphasized that Russia does not seek to mediate a conflict between Iran and Israel, but “provides its own ideas” for settlement. According to his speech, Russia will not be satisfied if “these ideas did not seem attractive.”

This Russian position, which was described as a “balanced” between Iran and Israel, wore important signs of Moscow’s desire to avoid penetration into conflict and the desire to rebuild her relations with Tel Aviv in the future after a period of apathy in the relationship of two sides. Please note that in the fall of the Bashar -Al Asad regime in Syria, Moscow rushed to the conclusion of its military units, which patrolled in the area of ​​the breakdown of the conflict in Golan, which paved the path for Israel with strong blows on Syrian military abilities and expanding its influence in the region.

Experts considered that Russian caution to Israel, despite the tone of strict data, may be connected with the belief with Moscow, that in the future an agreement on relations with Tel Aviv will be useful for the mechanisms of reorganizing the Russian military presence in Syria. It is noteworthy that the Russian contacts of Israeli contacts on the Syrian issue did not begin, as “maybe” reported after the Israeli war, but rather began very early in March last year, after the United States invited the Israeli authorities to make sure that Russia remains in its military bases in Syria to resist the influence of the Turks in the country.

In this context, Roman Hoffman, one of the closest military advisers to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, visited Moscow in March, no details of what happened during it. However, The Israeli Newspaper “Yediot Aharonot” Wrote that Its Goal Focused on Enhancing Cooparation in the Security Field, Especially AGainSt the Background OF The Developments of the Sitation in Syria, in Reference to the Overthrow of the Previous Regime, and That Rearranging the Relationship with Moscove Falls Within the Preoritiesites of Netanyahu in the Matter Related to Syria, and “The israeli authorites Believe that this Will Help In Containing Turkish Influence in the region, which increased after changing the energy in Damascus.” Hoffman has already discussed. ” The future of Syria in other countries, and his mission is now to reach an agreement with Russia. ”

Daniela Krailov, a researcher of the “Middle East and the post -Soviet Union” at the Institute of Scientific Information on the Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told the newspaper Ezvasta that Israel in his policy in the Middle East as a whole and on Syrian tracks, in particular, always begins after his interests and have just been interested.

He believed that the condemnation of Israel was based on the fact that the region is currently not enough in the region. At the same time, Russia has significantly lost its position in Syria. In his opinion, “in the light of the current circumstances of Russia, Russia is a good opportunity to return. The question is that what is the value of the transaction with the tel -Aviv, and what are the concessions that Moscow will be forced to submit, and, most importantly, how these two rules will remain in the light of the presence of the government in Damascus, which are not alias, in addition to the trick.