Liputan6.com, jakarta – The Prosecutor’s Corruption Commission (KPK) demanded that the accused Hasto Christianto with a sentence of 7 years in prison in the case of bribery in the case of the Indonesian parliament Masik and the investigation case. The lawyer also appreciated that the letter with the requirement was made on a weak and hated legal basis.
“Listening, he became a witness to reading the requirements of the State Prosecutor. What can be conveyed is that the requirements of the State Prosecutor today are the requirements based on the imagination, assumptions and requirements full of hatred, ”said the lawyer Hasto, Patra M Zen in the Central Court for corruption of Jakarta, Thursday (3/7/2025).
Patra said that the case of bribery, which, states, Haso Christianto was convicted in 2020, was difficult to prove.
“Firstly, this is because it was tested in 2020, the second logic does not make sense. What does it mean? Does it make sense that General Secretary bars of money for a candidate? Does it make sense? ” He explained.
“As soon as the party secretary was to help out the money? This does not make sense logically, ”he continued.
According to him, an element of bribery is difficult to prove that the prosecutor decided to use Article 21 of the Corruption Criminal Law on Investigation. Just the charge of investigations is believed to not correspond to the facts.
“If we want to see which pioneers of the investigation, we are vertically today, this is because of the investigation of the road. What is this out of what? The file reaches the court. This is from what? Because the trial was successful, smoothly, ”he said.
“The question is that your father’s mother, who interferes with the trial? What is blocking judicial persecution? What else in blocking the investigation? ” Patra continued.
